Maytas Truths: How Should Public Infrastructure Be Funded?

re: Maytas Truths: How Should Public Infrastructure Be Funded?

Keira — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:19:20 GMT

I'm still intrigued at the media's reluctance to question Planning Commission on its scathing comments on Mr.Sridharan's complaint about the Maytas deal. Planning Commission and the head of Hyderabad Metro officially denigrated Mr.Sridharan when he said exactly what everyone now says with 20/20 hindsight.

Hyderabad Metro Rail Project and the quagmire of scandalous politics | Infinite Loop - Vivek Sanghi's Web Diary

Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:39:14 GMT

Pingback from Hyderabad Metro Rail Project and the quagmire of scandalous politics | Infinite Loop - Vivek Sanghi's Web Diary

re: Maytas Truths: How Should Public Infrastructure Be Funded?

V.B.N.Ram — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:17:02 GMT

The analysis above is a realistic assessment of the kind of model, would suit the construction of Metro rail projects within India.Though the Delhi Metro ( functioning under an autonomous corporation ) is a government owned and state operated model- it has escaped the baggage of a) wasteful expenses b) exorbitantly his costs of operation and c) long and delayed decision making, which generally typify public sector projects. In fact, The Delhi Metro Rail Corporation has over the years, earned record revenues. This is largely due to Mr. Sridharan's dynamism and leadership, but also because of a very good team under him and the cutting edge technology adopted for the project. It is tragic, that the Andhra Pradesh government, gave Sridharan a short shrift and spurned down the latter's offer for developing the Hyderabad Metro Rail project.

Assorted Links « Mostly Economics

Assorted Links « Mostly Economics — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:55:04 GMT

Pingback from Assorted Links « Mostly Economics