A Prime Minister Who Should Be An OpEd Writer - A Romantic Realist

A Prime Minister Who Should Be An OpEd Writer

Raju Narisetti - Sunday, November 30, 2008 7:55 PM

Usually, it is the opinion page editors of newspapers who are in the habit of telling the government and the people as to what ought to be done. In India, however, it is Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's speciality as the man who can get things done and who is supposed to get things done has increasingly turned into an editorial writer (or editorial speech maker), often simply telling the country what ought to be done rather than actually doing it.

The Romantic Realist's last blog post on the Indian government's Shameful Silence for some 17 hours after terrorists struck evoked a lot of interesting responses (read the blog and the comments here). But since the Prime Minister and his Congress party are a few months away from asking Indian voters to give them another five years at the helm of India, it seems appropriate to look at when he breaks his silence and his continued wish list of what ought to be done. So, here are some of his prescriptions for India from just his November speeches, all of which are listed on the Prime Minister's web site. In case you think the prescriptions are only about difficult to deal with subjects such as terrorism, I have listed Dr. Singh's prescriptions for a variety of problems, ranging from education and toilets to Himalayan glaciers and stimulating the Indian economy.

Hindustan Times Leadership Summit on 21 November 2008

"My greatest ambition for the coming century or the present century is to see a fully educated and empowered India. The light of knowledge must touch every child, male or female and empower every one of our citizens...Our challenges and our tasks present themselves to us everyday. It is up to us to exert pressure on our system to deliver results. We must improve the quality of our processes of governance, we must improve the quality of our educational system. We must improve the public delivery system, especially in health care, sanitation, drinking water, education and public transport. We must build a more efficient and competitive society. We must learn to respect the spirit of adventure and enterprise in our entrepreneurs. We must provide an even better environment for individual enterprise to flower and to flourish."

((So, Prime Minister, how about actually passing stalled education reforms bills or asking Arjun Singh to get out of the way?))

Third South Asian Conference on Sanitation on 18 November

"First, sanitation issues need to be given priority in our development policy approaches. Its cross cutting implications need deep study and greater understanding. The role of community leadership in changing old habits and ways of thinking will be crucial as our own experience has shown. The capacities of our rural and urban local bodies to address these issue from both social and economic angles will need to be enhanced. Second, sanitation has to be located in an integrated framework of public health policy to ensure that sanitation activities are indeed adequately funded. We know for example that something as simple as washing hands properly can check 50% of the diarrehea cases in our country. Provision of safe drinking water can also greatly help to contain the incidence of many water borne diseases. Similarly, provision of toilets near the habitat can protect our women against many stomach related diseases. Therefore, conscious efforts have to be made to invest in hygiene consciousness and sanitation as part of a holistic public health policy."

((So, Mr Prime Minister, what's stopping this being done in Bharat Nirman or any other large scale program?))

G20 Heads of State on 15 November 2008

"An obvious issue is to consider whether the emergence of recessionary trends calls for some fiscal stimulus. A coordinated fiscal stimulus by countries that are in a position to do so would help to mitigate the severity and duration of the recession. It would also send a strong signal to investors around the world. Resort to fiscal stimulus may be viewed as risky in some situations, but if we are indeed on the brink of the worst downturn since the Great Depression, the risk may be worth taking. We should therefore take all possible measures at the national level to complement any coordinated international stimulus."

((So, Mr Prime Minister, now that the all-talk, no-action Finance Minister is out of the way and you are incharge of the finance ministry, will we see some concrete and large stimulus package?))

Speaking to the Director Generals of Police on 23 November 2008:

"The virus of communal violence that threatens the secular fabric of our society needs to be checked and checked effectively in time, otherwise our multi-religious, multi-ethnic and multi-caste society could well unravel. The police need to demonstrate greater resourcefulness, greater strength and strength in term of both their intelligence machinery and their response capacity. This is equally true in some measure in regard to the threat from terrorist outfits. The inability of the Intelligence - Agencies and the police to obtain pinpointed and actionable intelligence and in time - has enabled these outfits to carry out some high-profile attacks. The resources at the disposal of the police are often inadequate. The strength of personnel in police stations clearly needs to be augmented. There are far too many vacancies, and much larger numbers need to be recruited into the police, particularly into the civil police. The intelligence machinery at both the Central and State levels needs to be upgraded and should be more sophisticated. Police training has not kept pace with requirements. A quantum increase in the Police Budget across the country is also called for."

((Mr Prime Minister, now that Mumbai terrorist attacks have made this inability ever more clear, will be see "quantum" increases in smart upgrades of our police and intelligence forces?))

"In 2005, while addressing this Conference, I had recommended a ‘Police Mission' approach with a view to achieving focused attention on different police related tasks. The intention was to create an image of the Indian Police as a professionally competent and technologically advanced force, one that would be an agent of socio-economic change endowed with a spirit of humanism. I am told that some steps have been taken in this direction and meetings of the ‘Micro Missions' that were established have been held. On the ground, however, tangible results are yet to be seen.

((So, Mr Prime Minister, three years later you come back and make a speech about your own Mission's poor performance. What else will you from now on?))

"The contours of internal security have changed fundamentally over the years, and the basic character of threats has become greatly enlarged and also more complicated. A question that is often posed is whether the police have adequately upgraded their skills, have an indepth understanding of to-day's security problems, are technologically qualified, and have honed their abilities in every direction."

((They clearly don't, Mr Prime Minister. So what do you actually plan to do?))

Addressing Indian Mountaineering Federation 26 November 2008:

"It is a matter of deep concern that the Himalayas are being threatened by climate change...We need to develop more expertise and capabilities in Himalayan glaciology. But even the threat of environmental damage should spur our nation to action. We must take all precautionary measures so that the danger which lurks in the background does not materialize....We must mobilize all our resources to protect the Himalayas."

((So, Mr Prime Minister, why don't you mobilize all our resources?))

Address To The Nation 27 November, 17 hours after Mumbai terrorist attacks started:

"(1) Instruments like the National Security Act will be employed to deal with situations of this kind. (2) Existing laws will be tightened to ensure that there are no loopholes available to terrorists to escape the clutches of the law. (3) Most importantly, it is essential to immediately set up a Federal Investigation Agency to go into terrorist crimes of this kind and ensure that the guilty are brought to book. (4) We will take up strongly with our neighbours that the use of their territory for launching attacks on us will not be tolerated, and that there would be a cost if suitable measures are not taken by them. (5) We will take a number of measures to strengthen the hands of our police and intelligence authorities. We will curb the flow of funds to suspect organizations. (6) We will restrict the entry of suspects into the country. (7) We will go after these individuals and organizations and make sure that every perpetrator, organizer and supporter of terror, whatever his affiliation or religion may be, pays a heavy price for these cowardly and horrific acts against our people."

((So, what are you waiting for, Mr. Prime Minister?))

Share this post: email it! | del.icio.us! | digg it! | newsVine!

From Dipesh Dipu

November 30, 2008 11:18 PM
I feel sorry for this person who had my respect for what he had done for India before he became the Prime Minister. It has been a steep and non-stop slide for him all these years. He has compromised on values for continuing in power. It is really amazing to see a person who had the courage to follow his belief in the economic reforms of 1990s, now ducking media in the middle of Mumbai crisis. His presence at ground zero with encourgament to security forces and calm assurance to public could have lifted him up. His impotent address to nation stating no tolerance for terrorism evoked nothing more than ridicule and pity that we have him as our leader. In terms of stature, the Prime Minister does not compare well with his own past, but no one else could be blamed for this disgrace.

From vivek sharma

December 1, 2008 1:16 AM
Raju, yours is a decent summary of the PM's performance. Thank you for this distillation. Doer's do. Leaders lead. Bureaucrat turned politicians push files - or audio files back to the people, like our esteemed Prime Minister. When a turtle is perched on a fence post you'd know he didn’t get there by himself and our 'democracy' has time and again this systemic knack of throwing up all kinds of turtles to the top. Is there no way that we as a polity can force our political parties to compulsorily hold inner party elections in the most genuine way? Where can leaders come from? The system can only be unclogged when this basic building block of democracy is addressed. A nation is not built in a couple of years, but every morning when we all wake up we must ask ourselves, are we channelising the right kind energy to the most important building blocks? Is our attention focused on the symptoms or the causes? Is the collective intellectual enterprise of India spreading itself too thin?

From Gopi

December 1, 2008 7:56 AM
Dipesh, I assume you are a young person who only knows the Manmohan Singh of 1991 vintage. But, his history goes back a lot farther, to the late 60's / early 70,s, and those of us who know his entire track record (of servitude to whoever happens to be his master/mistress) is not at all surprised at his opportunism. This so-called father of reforms was closely associated with the regime which imposed on our nation enlightening ecomonic measures such as nationalization of major banks, general insurance, oil refining, whole-sale grain trade etc., acts such as MRTP, FERA (Dr Fake Singh can be called father of FERA), top tax rates of 97.75% (yes, 97.75%), limit of Rs5,000 / month on director salaries and other restrictions on corporate operations, and many more things. He was RBI Governor when Rajiv Gandhi (who was not even part of Govt) launched Rajiv Loan melas where banks gave Rs5,000 without any collateral and most of that money went into pockets of local Congress pols and bank staff, setting the stage for the subsequent bank failures and govt bail-outs. As far as I recall, he, the supposed custodian of Indian banking, did not utter a word of protest. He was mouthing statist solutions as secretary general of South-South Commission just a few months before he was nominated MoF by Mr Rao. Once he was out of govt, he opposed most of the reforms or other measures initiated by the NDA govt, incl the highway project. So, he has a long track record of sucking up to the powers-that-be and compromising with principles (if any, that is). One does not get to keep his job regardless of regimes if he is not flexible like Dr Fake Singh Dhongi has been all thru his long public life, eventually becoming the regent, sorry PM, of the Gandhi Family. Contrast that to the fate of men of real principles - CD Deshmukh, IG Patel, Prof Lakdawala, etc.. It is time people came to realise what Mr Singh really has always been: a life-long opportunist and time-server who faithfully carries out whatever ordered / desired by his political masters / mistresses. For me, his last five years have been no surprise.

From Kalidas

December 1, 2008 8:05 AM
India does not need goody goody Prime Minister. We need really a KHADOOS and practical person to lead the nation. When the need of the hour was to have good and solid Home Minister, PM is sending non performing FM to play his tune as HM. If he fails there, he may move to DM (Defence Minister); and if he fails there, he will step up to PM. It is more like in secondary school where a student is promoted to higher class on ATKT basis, regardless of his poor performance. Indians appointed Man Mohan Singh as Prime Minister to do,act,defend, manage and lead the nation. Why does he remind the Indians we should do this, ought to do that etc. Just do it - goddman it. You are already there for that precise purpose. Either perform or perish and get the hell out of the parliament house.

From Sandeep Parekh

December 1, 2008 10:06 AM
Is that an offer from Mint to the PM? If so will the offer extend beyond April 2009?

From S

December 1, 2008 2:37 PM
Raju, You can't really accuse politicians of not doing anything! Here in Bombay, they have out up huge posters commemorating the cops who died in the terrorist attacks- except, the cops names and photos are tiny and the politicians photos and names are huge. So, Sonia Gandhi, Narayan Rane, Sachin Ahir among other local politicians are towering above those they are seeking to commemorate!! They are busy taking Ram Gopal Verma to the Taj and Oberoi and telling the media this was a small incident. Can't really accuse them of being oped writers!!

From raag

December 1, 2008 3:11 PM
I am not at all surprised by Dr. Singh's ineffectiveness and I am rather surprised no one has pointed at the root cause of this: he has zero (possibly negative, since he had lost the election to a lok sabha seat in delhi) political capital of his own. And a prime minister (or any politician for that matter) needs to have political capital of his (or her) own to make people toe his/her line - whether be it on personnel or policy. That is why I normally don't like technocrats and academicians in ministerial posts - they usually are unable to navigate the political maze (Arun Shourie might have been exception here because he had the full backing of a PM who had enough political capital to expend). That is why, who knows, Lalu prasad might have been a better finance minister than Chidambaram.

From raag

December 1, 2008 3:19 PM
Kalidas: Small correction. "Indians" never appointed Dr. Singh as the PM. It was Madame Gandhi who appointed Dr. Singh as PM. And if spin-meisters are to be believed, Madame Gandhi now seems to be really "outraged" at the inefficiency of the government led by her appointee!

From elsa

December 1, 2008 4:31 PM
i refer to melissa's simple but evocative comment on your previous blog - a shameful silence - as my thoughts on this and that are interlinked. she writes about walking home in the aftermath of 9/11 in manhattan, comforted by giuliani's words. not that he or anyone else knew what they were going to do at that point in time. not that with all the intelligence and resources in the world anyone can ever be fully protected against such attacks. but at least someone spoke and ordinary people listened and were comforted. even a bumbling and ridiculed president like bush spoke and people listened. i wish too that someone had spoken. i wish i didnt feel so fearful and disgusted, not just with the way we are governed and the people who govern us, but also with lopsided, shallow media (TV) coverage, and all the inanities and platitudes and hypocrisy that we are forced to listen to, day after day. i wish the society i live in was not so deeply and i fear, irredeemably, divisive i wish someone who has the power to change things had spoken, i wish they had meant what they said. and most of all, i wish i had a prime minister who would look me in the eye.

From Sandip

December 2, 2008 8:59 AM
hey that's a brilliant post-retirement idea you have given for the "Singh" whom all you media guys had annointed as "King" after the Nuclear Treaty. now that - after the mumbai apocalypse - chances of his and the UPA coming back in power looks slim - MINT should offer him an advance contract !! or do you think his writings would be as drab and platitudinous as his speeches - and, therefore, he won't be such a great readership draw ? :-) www.ghoses.blogspot.com

From Sandeep

December 2, 2008 10:44 AM
Another person who needs a job - CM of Maharashtra. But I don't think he'll need Mint's help, he's already tied up an acting job with a leading Bollywood director. Prescience, what?

From bidyut kumar chatterjee

December 2, 2008 2:06 PM
If I were the PM, I would have taken the following measures to curb terrorism to make India a terror free state. 1) At first to appoint bureaucrats in the Home Ministry in the key posts and immediately formed a Federal Investigative Agency headed by people like non political and strong KPS Gill and Kiran Bedi. 2) To take military action, striking in Pak occupied Kashmir’s LeT camps and if necessary other terrorist camps inside the Pakistan . 3) To take action against those political leaders who played politics over religions and disbanded those political parties who are interested to play vote bank politics over terrorism. 4) Bring new Stringent law for the terrorist and constituted Special Court (power equivalent to Apex Court) to punish the terrorist within a month or maximum two months of his arrest. Even those who are play politics over terrorism also be booked under the special court jurisdiction. 5) As a Prime Minister of the country formed a high power committee under the guidance of Leader of the Opposition to look after the security of the nation. 6) As the country is day by day progressing as a world power, and terrorist wants to destabilise us from the development, hence reforms will continue. 7) Given greater and constitutional powers to CBI and ATS for impartial investigation, to curb the allegation and counter allegation. 8) To curb terrorism review the strategic border position and relation with our neighbour, particularly Bangladesh and Pakistan after every sixth month. 9) Finally no compromise with terrorist or terrorism, and if any body found guilty heshould be booked under the act as per terrorist. Yours truly Bidyut Kumar Chatterjee 1159/ Sector 23 A Faridabad 121005

From Old Hand

December 3, 2008 5:17 PM
Its pathetic to see Manmohan speak about climate change. Under his stewardship, India has its worst destruction of natural resources. The SEZ phenomena grabbed land that supported livelihood and ecosystems. The Environmental Impact Assessment became a ridiculous farce controlled by local beauracrt-big industrialist nexus. Projects like Lavasa which destroyed entire ecosystems and killed thousands of trees became reality under this PM's govt. Shame on him.

From The man who knows exactly how to fix India’s problems | The Acorn

December 7, 2008 8:02 PM

Pingback from  The man who knows exactly how to fix India’s problems | The Acorn

From Trailblazer

December 8, 2008 6:23 PM
That's all he has been doing over the four years of his term. It hurts to think that the outrage and anger in India is expressed by a man, rather cold in personality. The fact is he cannot harden up. He needs to step aside.

POST YOUR COMMENT

:
(required)
 
Email Address
(required)
   
(optional)
(HTML not allowed)