When Kalam doesn't cut it - A Romantic Realist

When Kalam doesn't cut it

Raju Narisetti - Thursday, December 18, 2008 4:14 PM

In one of those typical company-wide emails that only IT people can send, one landed in my in box a little while ago, titled "How Can I Contribute in Saving Corporate Costs?"

The IT department has decided that sending me an excerpt from a speech, supposedly given by former Indian president and now major gadfly, A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, titled "Be the change you want to see!" (which in my book is now clearly up there in recently overdone cliches) is the perfect way to try and make me conserve energy and money.

The excerpt is all about the savings that can be generated--in only the complicated PowerPoint way that Mr. Kalam is prone to--from everyone shutting down their PC. "So, before leaving office, take some time to shut down the PC and do some favour to the country and the organisation," ends the speech.

If IT dept at my company is serious about helping with cost cutting, they are perhaps better off asking one of the office assistants or the numerous office watchmen or elevator operators to switch the errant computers off, assuming switching off power to the floor is not an option. But, I digress.

This may be heresy but having read and heard Mr. Kalam for two years now, the Romantic Realist now finds much of what the former President says rather simplistic and often totally out of touch with any reality or execution/operational issues. Stuff like his speech that the Press Trust of India carried earlier today and I quote:

Kalam favours national campaign, UN task force to tackle terror

New Delhi: As the country debates how to tackle the increased spate of terror attacks, former President APJ Abdul Kalam today suggested the launch of a national campaign to eradicate terrorism. Kalam also favoured constitution of a special task force under the United Nations to tackle terrorism at the global level.

Participating in an idea exchange programme here, the former president said the national campaign should focus on eradicating poverty, education as well as making people aware of the perils of terrorism.Efforts should be made to guide people, specially the youth properly. Questioned as to what action should be taken by India to stop Pak-sponsored terrorism, he said, "The simple principle is that strength respects strength. "India becoming a nuclear power state was the right thing to do," he said."Terrorism is a nuisance, bad for humanity. When evil minds have come together then good minds cannot be watching."

The United Nations cannot be sitting and watching when such things are happening. "My suggestion is that let there be a United Nations force for counter-terrorism," he said. PTI

So, let me see. Terrorism is "a nuisance, bad for humanity"? And the out-of-box solutions being proposed by Mr Kalam: "A national campaign to eradicate terrorism" and "A United Nations task force to tackle terrorism."

This is the kind of Kool-Aid statesmenship in the guise of thought leadership that is being increasingly dished out by the likes of  Mr. Kalam or former Infosys Chairman NR Narayana Murthy in India. And promptly recycled in the super spam that only IT departments can generate. Indeed, the email from my IT dept ends with this appeal to create more spam: "If you feel that this point is to be considered, forward this to all your friends."

What if we start contributing to "saving corporate costs" by getting rid of people who think up such nonsensical emails that then waste precious employee time?

Share this post: email it! | del.icio.us! | digg it! | newsVine!

From K. Srikrishna

December 18, 2008 6:05 PM
Raju, Even as I agree with your comments re NRN and APJ, I can't but help wince, at the truthful yet seemingly unkind statement. These two gentleman at least have accomplished through their life work, what I'd term as inspiring for countless others. I wonder what the role of the media is in regurgitating their statements vapid or otherwise, without a critical eye. Alas, I could forgive this if it were only confined to assertions by folks with a reasonable track record, in other words cutting them some slack. But we largely seem to fill newsprint, with unvalidated and often preposterous assertions even from much lesser mortals! This too is a form of spam by the print media and deserves the same fate as those from your IT folks! ps. the link to gadfly is (broken) and pointing to Kool-Aid && why, oh why, does your tweet point to preposterous which requires a whole another click to get to this blog?

From Yogesh

December 18, 2008 6:17 PM
I think Kalam’s mail is for those who get carried away by some sort of a fascination. If a particular political party (SP) pushes its point using Kalam’s name and it succeeds, can’t HT’s IT team do it for a better cause. After all, we have seen people marching with candles after watching actors and actresses. Won’t they shut down their pcs’ if someone whom they have respect is making the appeal. Kalam’s suggestion on tackling terror is indeed impractical

From Raju Narisetti

December 18, 2008 7:11 PM

Srikrisha--the blog is about "things and people as they might and ought to be" so perhaps this is more about opportunity lost when leaders who can really lead go all mushy on me. Thanks for flagging the gadfly broken link. Have fixed it. As for Posterous, it is a one-stop email that saves me the trouble of going to several different places incl Twitter. Check it out, quite a useful site (posterous.com). Raju

From Kishore Budha

December 18, 2008 9:32 PM
I think this was long overdue and time somebody suggested to Kalam he should retire to Kerala and play the Veena. In my humble opinion, Kalam is perhaps representative of the intellectual bankruptcy and the sheer desperation of the public sphere. From washed out left politicians, to right-wing ideologues, to the new class of public intellectuals comprised of the techno-managerial class, we are struggling to define our own version of modernity. Very few people offer us ideas that illuminate. Again, this is reflective of the nature of the public sphere rather than the actual ability of the Indian society. I think the only reason we hold him in reverence is because he is the provider of the bomb and we have a fixation with technologists!

From vivek sharma

December 19, 2008 12:55 AM
I am hoping for the day when some philanthropist will fund a finishing school that is targeted at 'Famous' and 'Important' people who are well past their expiry date in public life. Special head hunters will recruit all such worthies and gently teach them how to retire gracefully. Hopefully most will, but knowing some of our incorrigibles, there will also be an advanced course (a boot camp) for those fugitives from reality who will be told to just shut up.

From Gopi

December 19, 2008 12:29 PM
Mr Budha, People have reverence for our ex-pres, Mr Kalam, not only because he was involved with the bomb (what is wrong with that) but also because he is a simple man with humble roots and reached where he did because of his abilities (and play of fate as well), totally unlike a complete duffer being parleyed as the new "hope" of India by the bhat charans of the dynasty.

From Nitin

December 19, 2008 4:26 PM
Raju, You've stumbled on the Great Indian Law of Automatic Universal Expertise. It says that any Indian who has achieved fame (perhaps, but not necessarily due to scholarship or expertise) in one field, is automatically considered an expert in all others. Since those experts are Indians too, the Law applies to them too---so a development economist can write about identity and violence, a fiction writer can write about foreign policy, and a self-help guru can pontificate on what caused the Mumbai attacks. Dr Kalam and Mr Murthy stand out in aspect because they stand out in general. Lesser mortals (including yours truly) are subject to the same Law, but we stand out less because we stand out less in general.

From Kishore Budha

December 20, 2008 12:01 AM
@nitin: Rather than disqualifying a development economist writing about identity and violence one could engage with their ideas, if they are good, or ignore them if they are not. Isn't it more interesting to observe the audience to a communicative act rather than the speech act itself. E.E Schattschneider's words are particularly instructive here. Do not look at the fight. Focus on who is supporting who amongst those fighting.

From Kishore Budha

December 20, 2008 12:10 AM
@Gopi: "Reverence"... hmmm. I never said it was wrong to have the big b. But a defence of the big b tells us something about its defenders -- good, bad, or value-neutral. That is what interests me. But yes, he is a quaint chap.

From Rma212

December 20, 2008 2:37 AM
Bravo!

From Nitin

December 20, 2008 9:19 AM
Kishore, Who is disparaging anyone? Or are you arguing that the said development economist is also an expert in matters of identity and violence? Whether you must engage, ignore or disparage is a subjective call. Objectively, IMHO, we should not have a problem accepting the Law applies in this case.

From Nitin

December 20, 2008 9:25 AM
Kishore, Also, I don't think this business of what is more interesting to observe is relevant in the public policy context. What matters more is what ideas are brought into the public discourse, and their soundness. I'm sure the audience reaction to Shivraj Patil was very interesting to some people. But the real issue was stopping terrorism. Ditto Manmohan Singh on a variety of fronts.

From Kishore Budha

December 21, 2008 2:12 PM
Nitin, agreed. If we are dealing with a real problem, we need to tackle it with good science and thus we need to evaluate suggested courses of action. But there are other ways of thinking about such situations, for example by reproblematising our understanding of terrorism.

From Nitin

December 23, 2008 5:53 PM
Kishore, I think solving problems is generally a better than reproblematising our understanding of them.

From Kishore Budha

December 24, 2008 2:28 AM
nitin, "solving problems is generally a better than reproblematising our understanding of them." Either way, I think that is quite telling.

From When Kalam doesn’t cut it | India Cell Phones

June 26, 2009 12:51 PM

Pingback from  When Kalam doesn’t cut it | India Cell Phones

POST YOUR COMMENT

:
(required)
 
Email Address
(required)
   
(optional)
(HTML not allowed)