Who is this Shahrukh Khan character anyway? - The Expat Blog

Who is this Shahrukh Khan character anyway?

Melissa A. Bell - Sunday, August 16, 2009 2:26 PM
Kidding, kidding, kidding.

Let's just get this out of the way: Yes, an officer likely religiously profiled the guy. Yes, it sucks that we religiously profile and racially profile people in the US. There are small-minded people in positions of authority and that authority can be abused. But that's what this incident says about the US.

What does it say about India?

Yes, it sucks being detained at the airport. I know. I have been. About seven or eight times. Not because I have a Muslim name, but for whatever reason the security guys have come up with that day (flying on a one-way ticket, having a Pakistani visa, a rip in my passport, the list goes on).

It's annoying. It's not fun. It's even kind of scary. But there are a lot worse things than being held up a couple hours at an airport. Like being attacked by violent killers. Or others being attacked by violent killers.

I like what Salman Khan said, "The detention was for security purpose. And it is not a big deal....No 9/11-like incident occurred in US [since] because of strict vigil and I believe it is a good thing." (Disclaimer: This reporter thinks Salman is way cuter than SRK.)

All this brouhaha won't really change the racial profiling in the U.S., especially when it sounds like SRK is throwing a temper tamper. He says: "But I'm a movie star!" the security official says, "Come with me."

You know SRK wanted to hear: "Oh, sir, I am so sorry. I should have known. You are the man who dances even better than the Big B!" And when he didn't, he pitched a fit.

And all these calls of injustice from politicians and stars reaffirms the idolatry of VIP status in India. SRK shouldn't have been detained! He's a great movie star! Just google him and see!

So, what? Only movie stars should be exempt from racial profiling?

This whole incident recalled a moment my friend Anand Giridharadas wrote about in the New York Times when he was in Boston:

"The woman reached for my ticket. I had entered the parking lot two hours and a few minutes earlier. The first two hours were free, but I had stepped just across the line into paying territory. Would she let it slide?

She appeared East African; I am an American who lives in India; I imagined that she and I might have a shared sense of the situation. I was just a few minutes over, and in our Old Countries I might have been waved through with a flexible shrug.

But not here, not in America, where there are rules to bring human caprice under control. She asked for $2, and I paid, with a feeling of sadness at the coldness of our interaction and yet also a sense of admiration for the great human accomplishment -- the invention of patterns that apply to everyone always, not selectively and sometimes -- behind that coldness."

Okay, maybe this was a selective choice of a man with a Muslim name. But that same day, Bob Dylan was detained by police just a few miles away from the airport SRK sat at. Kind of takes the wind out of SRK's sails.

I think if SRK wants to make a mountain of a molehill about problems with the US, he ought to choose something a little less petty to get so indignant about. I can offer him a few options: the lack of access to health care by millions of citizens, the low literacy rate in girls living in the South, the conflicts arising from illegal immigration, the rise of hate crimes, the continued existence of laws such as "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and the Patriot Act. I can go on...

Share this post: email it! | del.icio.us! | digg it! | newsVine!

From RDX

August 16, 2009 3:33 PM
I liked the Salman's view point. After breaking so many laws in India, he has become a lot wiser..( I think so..).

From sdc

August 16, 2009 4:32 PM
Not sure as to who you think YOU are. Well, this is your blog, and you are perhaps entitled to show off your attitude and wear it on your wrist. You are not the only individual who may think that having a portion of cyberspace gives you the right to speak shit about other people. Take the liberty of performing a google search on your name (69 results) and do one on Shah Rukh Khan (4.7 million results). A person from India would have some humility faced with such a result, but your flaunting attitude is the only thing to be expected from a product of a society that cares least about other nations.

From Ravi

August 16, 2009 4:49 PM
I have been to US couple of times and at any port of entry I never faced racial profiling. This SRK issue is blown out of proportion. I admire the steps taken up by USA to safeguard their country, which we couldn't do in our Country, and in our Country People want to show their superiority by disrespecting laws, everybody want to show that they are above law and VIP. I think it’s quite overrated story.

From Jonathan S

August 16, 2009 4:52 PM
I really enjoyed this post Melissa. I agree that commentators are conflating two things: that SRK may have been racially profiled, and that he was stopped despite being a VVIP. The jury's still out on whether he was racially profiled (the only evidence I've seen is that SRK SAYS he was stopped because his name is a common Muslim name. I, like you Melissa, have been stopped many times at US airports -- and I don't have a Muslim last name). If he was stopped because of racial profiling, then I do think that's cause for concern. But being a celebrity -- or ex-statesmen, in Kalam's case -- isn't reason to skip security checks. Plenty of high profile people in the US -- celebrities like Bob Dylan -- get stopped all the time. Maybe one can make a case for serving politicians or diplomats, etc., to have expedited security, but giving famous movie stars free-entry through security is a slippery slope. @SDC: By the way, you're right, we should judge people only on their google hits. 'Melissa Bell' turns up 1.7 million in Google, so I don't think she's doing so bad on your barometer.

From sb

August 16, 2009 5:00 PM
dude you don't get the point.. if an icon like srk faces this imagine what happens to the rest. and lolz at salman to compare himself with srk. So, what? Only movie stars should be exempt from racial profiling? no. i think you need to think more and write less. read it "at least known icons of a country should be respected" srk has ruled bollywood easily for more than a decade now. theres more to say.. but i guess you will put some more thought and not judge things by "cuteness" for example

From sv

August 16, 2009 5:10 PM
Just because someone's name give huge no of search results on google does not mean he can be left into a country with out any questions!! There are procedures in place, and need to be followed.. and SRK is making a hill out of a molehill.

From Raakshas

August 16, 2009 5:13 PM
"Yes, it sucks that we religiously profile and racially profile people in the US". Yea you Americans suck!

From Skay

August 16, 2009 5:23 PM
OMG, I cant get off this, it seems a tad too juvenile worth this attention. SRK grilled at Newark airport- Gaah! Big deal, and this nonchalance comes from a SRK fan, because I have no idea why this megalomania for SRK. Ok hes the King Khan, I believe, but what makes him think hes so all important especially in an alien country, that he should be given a celebrity treatment. Afetr all he was only questioned-admitted that US Homeland security has certain draconian laws, some dont seem too work as much, but hell whats with the claim of profiling and people not knowing who SRK is? SRk must get it off his head that hes a global icon, handful of people outside our ethnicity would know who SRK is, lets stop living in a fool's paradise. He is no Jacko, no Brad pitt, dont think thats ever gonna happen, and that's not bad. Why go so far, will South's one of the best known actors Mohan Lal be known by all and sundry in North? And all the talk of Indian govt and the bigwigs-so called getting involved, agitated just makes a good laugh. Agreed - being frisked or questioned for no reason is annoying, but well eat ur humble pie SRK...you need US more than US needs you. And after if the bigger truth is to protect their homeland, you bebtter allow yourself to be frisked. Peace!

From indian

August 16, 2009 6:29 PM
uff...its so silly to know that Salman luks cute pie for you...the man who takes law into his hands & responsible for death:-) strange is the word...its not about SRK getting detained..the Question is y a section of people are getting targeted..all the time..thats humility...religion is not a Terrorism,and if SRK is feeling bad,it obvious for his cadre any one in that position wud feel the same..yest Kalam ..today SRK..who is next..Terrorisim is not only in INDIA..our country faced the most still we neglect to see the loopholes & don't rectify..we should give the same treatment to those poeple....and for god sake GET A LIFE!!!..if you dont support SRK thats ok..he is not craving for your support..but dont support fault people like Salman...and wat did u say Cutier..hehehe:-);-)

From Raj

August 16, 2009 6:48 PM
Melissa, You are right, law is equal to everyone, no one is an exception. Just wanted to make a point clearer. SRK is not only a movie Idol in India, he is one of the few actors who is grounded, please, no comparisons with Salman Khan, who managed to drive over a few people on the platforms of Mumbai in a reckless drunken stupor, or kills animals for pleasure against laws just for some adrenalin gush... SRK is a family man, he is an actor and he is very popular, this once again makes me think, why we as one of the best nations in the world do not have some internet equipped search engines in the airport that these security officers can browse through to get the data, without having to raise a hue and cry every time an actor from India comes to the airport...this is for all the famous actors who have been detained in the recent past - Kamal Hassan, from TamilNadu, India, Mamutti from Kerala, India and now SRK from Madhya Pradesh, India... and so on... I am sure the Indian Embassy has better things to do than visit the airports every time a popular actor plans to visit the USA!

From mahus

August 16, 2009 6:58 PM
Kudos to the writer well written article..............Srk is just human.......no alien coming from an outer world............He must keep his inflated ego to himself....

From aarti

August 16, 2009 7:06 PM
For the kind info of some in here...........Salman has more its in google than srk........He is quiet easily more searched than Shahrukh.......this doesnt make him any better or superior to anyone else in the world..........

From aarti

August 16, 2009 7:06 PM
For the kind info of some in here...........Salman has more its in google than srk........He is quiet easily more searched than Shahrukh.......this doesnt make him any better or superior to anyone else in the world..........

From Divya Seethapathy

August 16, 2009 7:09 PM
Very aptly said. The officer at the airport was only doing his duty and i feel the media is only mountain out of a mole hill. If Shah Rukh Khan chooses to get angry that is his personal reaction. The media does not have to project it as a reflection of every Indian's sentiment. As Indians we love our stars but at the same time we also respect the laws and regulations of other countries.

From Carol Taylor

August 16, 2009 7:10 PM
I am deeply ashamed for the bad treatment given Shahrukh Khan a few days ago here in the United states. I am a born in the USA Caucasian with no Indian or Asian background at all and Shahrukh Khan is the MOST famous movie star in the world as far as I and many of the people I know feel. From the first time I saw one of his movies in 2003 he's been my own favorite movie star EVER and all other actors and entertainers are nothing compared to him. He's the most talented, witty and sensually attractive performer in the world...and most everyone in the world except Caucasians in the US and Canada know that....but here people don't watch movies with subtitles so they are missing knowing of the greatest talent alive today. I think it's horrific that he was treated so shabbily and clearly racial profiled because of his last name being Muslim (his Hindu secretary was allowed to leave right away, they only held Shahrukh).

From HarryV

August 16, 2009 7:10 PM
My name is Khan IS this a gimmick - is this a publicity stunt? Who cares, quite frankly, as a non-SRK-fan. Want to frisk Brad Pitt? Go ahead, do it. You know what - when it is done Pitt isn't going to go on record and then claim the Indians were racist. Shah Rukh should have shut his trap and gone through the process. IT is he who wishes to do business with the USA and not exactly the other way around. IF you don't like the rules of the game then you don't play it. Whilst fawning and boot licking is a true Indian sport, our passivity leads us to be olympic gold silver and bronze winners at that. Watching our 200 lb belt popping gut bursting cops at various high profile Installations makes me feel : Mera bharat kaam se gaya!

From Allwyn Dcosta

August 16, 2009 7:12 PM
Like always, Shahrukh went to dance to some patriotic songs, make a million bucks for his own good and make a complete mockery of Indians and himself in some other country. This time it was an Independence day function unlike weddings, Birthdays and inauguration functions where Shahrukh is known to dance for money. It's completely like the old saying ,'Begaani Shaadi mein Shahrukh deewana!!!!!" Oops!!! Its Abdullah deewana. It was a business tour for Shahrukh to earn some moolah for himself ,and in no way was the US government or the US security going to benefit from Shahrukh's visit.They didn't even call him to their country. Why the hell on Earth would they then compromise on their security procedures. Moreover, Indian actors, politicians and page 3 celebs have earned a name for themselves in cases involving illegally helping people immigate to other countries, have been caught with illegal items like drugs during security checks at international airports. In fact we should learn a lesson from US authorities,who treat a pompous bollywood star and a common man in the same way. No wonder why there has not been even a single terror attack on American soil after 9/11. And in India hundreds die every year in terror attacks. Everytime time a terror attack takes place, the Indian government and security personnels are awestruck. And there are some people who are making the whole thing a communal issue.They dont know that while they are reading this comment, the already richie rich Shahrukh has become richer by a couple of millions with this controversial visit to US. Shahrukh might have thought that he was at Chhatrapati Shivaji terminous where a fat constable with tobacco stained teeth would put up a sugary smile wen he wld see shahrukh, say salam saab and ask for an autograph for his kid at home, all in the name of security check.

From Vijay

August 16, 2009 7:15 PM
Talking of American movie stars and Brad Pitt, Shah Rukh Khan has said to the press today that he'll volunteer to frisk Angelie Jolie for the Indian government next time she travels to India.

From Raju Vaidya

August 16, 2009 7:16 PM
No wonder why there wasn't a single strike in US since 9/11. Their action to protect their conuntry from the Muslim terrorists is justified.. These Bollywood celebrities think themshelve above everything. They think they are the Most Important citizens of the world and the world is blessed by having them. If Times put him in top 50, that doesn\'t mean everybody around the world need to know that. Times is not the Treasure of Knowledge.. Grow up Farah Khan.. Mahesh Bhatt is always defending Pakistan's position..

From sourabh

August 16, 2009 7:18 PM
Truely said.. keep it up. Cool to see Salman with a +ve response.

From SP

August 16, 2009 7:19 PM
To sdc ugust 16, 2009 4:32 PM SDC, that's the difference between India and the USA, isn't it? It does not matter if someone has zero google hits or 10 hits or 1 billion hits, it does not matter if they are a commoner, or a so called super star with an over inflated ego and mountain sized sense of entitlement - all are same before the law and its rules and regulations. The pity of it all is that due to misguided ministers Ambika Soni and Praful Patel, who are ever eager to pander to the Bollywood set and the media networks who give them endless airtime, the USA might just pay heed to their protestations and actually be forced to make some sort of apology to wretched SRK. Which might be a steep price for them to pay later, if it leads to American security agencies being forced to stop religion based profiling and they let slip a few terrorists into their country, to wreak another Sept 11. Or even worse.

From RawJas

August 16, 2009 7:20 PM
I agree with US Visa officials, no slacking on duty infact India should learn from its mistakes. Zero tolerance is the key, after 9/11 theres has been no other incidence in USA. Question is Why ? Can India say the same thing after repeatedly being attacked ? SRK is no different than any other person, if your name is similar to a group of radicals who create chaos and think terrorism as their way of life, they need to be quarantined for investiagation, if they are clean and honest why do they fear ??

From jess

August 16, 2009 7:20 PM
props to the person who commented before me. and get over yourself shahrukh khan. i'm glad he got a taste of what regular people go through.

From seema shahani hiranandani

August 16, 2009 7:21 PM
what a fantastic post...yeah i guess shahrukh is all flusstered coz he thinks hes above the rest , the common man ....

From Daya Sharma

August 16, 2009 7:24 PM
I am very much impressed with the comments of great great actor Salman Khan. Nobody is bigger than the public safety. We all want safe world, then why so much cry over such incidence, which are the part of security.

From Amir Hussain

August 16, 2009 7:24 PM
I am honestly shocked with what oyur writing [but ho really cares about your opinion you must have a loose character] but yeah it's kind of funny when people use jealousy as an excuse to secretly let their ego get in the way of "journalism", but anyways as to your blog article [unofficial] i agree that there should not be double standards, but when a public figure is reputed, awarded and then humilated, it quiet doesnt go well with the whole aura what SRK is about. What would you say about a US aviation flight that was due to take off from a Delhi airport in India, humiliated a dignitary of the country, Former President Abdul kalam, he who is exempted from such activity and security exposure, was made to remove his footwear and empty his pockets. A public figure of India is by Law exmpted from such activity, a pserson who has moved India to another level, who has run the country, has no special rights??? this a person of such accolades should be exmpted!! he is not going to attack a country who has saved a country from ruins and run it!

From Rakesh S

August 16, 2009 7:25 PM
A nicely written article. Indeed Shah Rukh might be a mega star in India but it's frivolous to expect everyone in US to know him. The racial profiling during security checks has existed in the US for ages and nobody seems to frown about it when carried out on the "lesser mortals". Nonetheless, inspite of it share of problems India has always been the most tolerant country in the world so lets celebrate this fact on our Independence day and also steadfast in protecting our country. And I am sure the king Khan will keep his cool as usual and wouldn't mind a little free publicity for "My name is Khan.." :) . Jai hind.

From Gowri

August 16, 2009 7:27 PM
Very sensible article. I read some of the comments of some crazy people like Mahesh bhatt etc.. and I read even a union minister was making ridiculous statements on this issue. These people must have been hiding or in a different planet when bombay was burning recently....

From KT Narayana

August 16, 2009 7:29 PM
Good comment. US Law is not discriminatory in the way it is applied. That is the good side of US Law. Security is important and India should care a lot about the lives of its citizens. India should learn a lot about how to protect Indian lives, and lives of people in general. SRK is fuming because he is used to privilege in India and expects it elsewhere also. It is time that privileges are contained in Indian psyche.

From SankAr

August 16, 2009 7:30 PM
My mother 60 year old travelled with my dad she was pulled for secondary and she was fine after that ( we are Hindus) This is a very routine thing in US. Thatswhy we don't have any attacks after 09/11. SRK don't be a baby.

From Praveen

August 16, 2009 7:32 PM
Why make a big deal with SRK's incident? He may be a mega star in India but not definitely not in USA. Further he is no bigger personality than Mr. Abdul Kalam. Request media to understand it.

From mattmag

August 16, 2009 7:32 PM
What an overreaction! A couple of years ago, US Senator Ted Kennedy (brother of president John F Kennedy) was also detained at an airport on a domestic flight. So we have paranoid airport security - maybe we're just sick of people bombing our planes? No harm came to SRK. He was detained for an hour. Really, it's no big deal. If you want to protest against us, at least find a better reason than this.

From rajesh hk

August 16, 2009 7:34 PM
I agree with you 101%. India has too many VIPs, VVIPs, VV...IPs. It's totally out of control. Bottom line is nobody is above the law. People like SRK should have the decency to be a lot more humble rather than acting "child like". It's a lesson for all of bollywood and all the other VV...IPs.

From vivekpanda

August 16, 2009 7:35 PM
instead of crying wolf we should take a leaf out of their book and stop immediately the culture of VIPism so that in future we will also became as secure as the USA. there is nothing discriminatory in it. moreover our own record in dealing with our GUJRAT MUSLIM and KHANDHAMAL CHRISTIAN lefts a lot to be desiried. finally SHAHRUKH KHAN and his ilks who are more equel then us in INDIA should behave like a man and must not create a fuss over it.

From srikanth

August 16, 2009 7:37 PM
I can't agree more with this author. He is 100% correct and the conclusion is we should stop the VIP culture which is a clear discrimination against unprivileged in India. Why should we get angry with what happened to Abdul Kalam our beloved former President and why should we get hurt with this Khan's episode is beyond me. Get over guys.

From arvind

August 16, 2009 7:38 PM
If two rookie cops can stop an American icon, Bob Dylan, why not SRK? Why he should be treated above the law. He is not like Mother Teresa, he is just an entertainer, now it seems like with an big ego! That is why I love USA, most of time everyone falls into same band....JUST AN AVERAGE HUMAN BEING...thanks,

From rajesh

August 16, 2009 7:39 PM
Shahrukh did not fall from the sky. The fact that Indians treat him as if he did, doesn't change the fact that he did not. People in the west are more egalitarian (rules apply to everyone and no special rules for celebrities and politicians) and this is one of the few qualities we should learn from the west. Take the good qualities from the west, not the junk hypersexuality culture. I earn for the day when the Prime Minister's Independence day speech is the main headline and not the "detention" of a spoilt celebrity. When you enter another country, follow their rules (even if it involves questioning for 2 hours) and guess what, if you do not like their rules, do not go to that country.

From shaji

August 16, 2009 7:40 PM
We cannot and we should not blame US Airport Security authority on Mr. Shahrukh Khan matter, in fact we must appreciate them that they are trying their best and give no chance for their security lapse. We must also learn from them how they are functioning and their strictness on security matter. There is no foolproof security in our country and things are going as RamBarose, we talk big but do less, whereas US talk less but do more, and no matter whether the person is former Indian President or a well-known cine artist, they do their duties absolutely well and nobody could escape from them. No need for Shahrukh to get angry. Why should he go to US? They did not come here and insult him. Last month their airlines personal humiliated our most respected former President APJ Abdulkalam in our own airport, what our govt. did - nothing. This is the difference between our Mentality and the American's Mentality, they don't care anyone anaywhere, they are determined and bold enough to do anything. We are very very weak, flexible, no strict policy, no rule, inactive, complete failure and our style is to surrender to others. If our Air India has done similar they did to Mr.Kalam in the US, that was the end of Air India for the operation from the US, but we have pardoned and no action has been taken against that US airlines. After the World Trade Centre attack, there is not a single incident happened all these years, whereas how many terrorist attacks took place in our country each year, still terrorists are roaming all over our country and planning attacks. Shahrukh is famious in India and give respect and enjoy status, these luxuaries you cannot expect from US or Europe. Better keep quite and rub yourself your wounds

From shaji

August 16, 2009 7:40 PM
We cannot and we should not blame US Airport Security authority on Mr. Shahrukh Khan matter, in fact we must appreciate them that they are trying their best and give no chance for their security lapse. We must also learn from them how they are functioning and their strictness on security matter. There is no foolproof security in our country and things are going as RamBarose, we talk big but do less, whereas US talk less but do more, and no matter whether the person is former Indian President or a well-known cine artist, they do their duties absolutely well and nobody could escape from them. No need for Shahrukh to get angry. Why should he go to US? They did not come here and insult him. Last month their airlines personal humiliated our most respected former President APJ Abdulkalam in our own airport, what our govt. did - nothing. This is the difference between our Mentality and the American's Mentality, they don't care anyone anaywhere, they are determined and bold enough to do anything. We are very very weak, flexible, no strict policy, no rule, inactive, complete failure and our style is to surrender to others. If our Air India has done similar they did to Mr.Kalam in the US, that was the end of Air India for the operation from the US, but we have pardoned and no action has been taken against that US airlines. After the World Trade Centre attack, there is not a single incident happened all these years, whereas how many terrorist attacks took place in our country each year, still terrorists are roaming all over our country and planning attacks. Shahrukh is famious in India and give respect and enjoy status, these luxuaries you cannot expect from US or Europe. Better keep quite and rub yourself your wounds

From John Major

August 16, 2009 7:41 PM
Looks like Mr Khan is trying to get some cheap publicity for his upcoming movie. He has to to understand that his VIP status does not give him a free pass to bypass security screening. He has be a role model to others instead of trying to be a crybaby. Learn from President Kalam and be humble and accept the hard truths of today's world.

From balachader

August 16, 2009 7:43 PM
dude - I go thru this everytime without my last name being 'Khan', How is SRK differant from me as far as security is concerned? He should get on with it and move on, he needs to appreciate the fact that Airport Secutiry cannot be biased to one person vs other in the interest of millions

From oscar casto

August 16, 2009 7:46 PM
This looks like a cheap publicity stunt by Shahrukh and Karan to promote their latest flick 'My Name is Khan". This is not the first time Shahrukh has been to USA to be detained. So many indians get questioned why the media never publishes their ordeal. Looks like the media has got good money and coverage from Karan Johar & Shahrukh Khan to highlight the issue. SRK & KJ please focus on making good cinema people will watch movies anyways.If you make dud movies then no matter what you do your movies will never be appreciated by the people. Have faith in your work and not in these cheap publicity stunts you pull each time you want to release your movies.

From Papri

August 16, 2009 8:58 PM
I guess SRK not being able to hold Karan Johar for 15+ hours flight to the US made him frustrated... SRK do me a favor and stop making films altogether.

From Indian American

August 16, 2009 9:12 PM
Okay - there is really no difference between the harvard professor who was arrested in his home and SRK incident. Both are celebrities in their circles and expected an amount of courtesy from the officials. Funny thing is, in case of harvard professor, president came to his rescue. Similarly if this were to happen to Larry Elison or Bill Gates, you would have your both state senators standing outside the airport - that is the power of money. US is nothing but a money-whore. You show them your clout and then there will be many phone calls being made on your behalf. For the people, who are worried about terrorism, take a look at US's greatest friend - saudi. The whole bin-laden family getting special treatment from the then president. This is not uniform application of law - this is indeed VIP and VVIP worship - the difference is you need to make them realize the loss. If treating SRK badly means Coke losing sales in India then I bet there will be lobbyists busy calling to their capital hill puppets to get things moving in amicable manner - so lets just cut the crap of US having equal rules for all - it is the money and the amount of loss of profits that can result that matters. Has anyone wondered why Google, Cisco and rest are saying "how high" when China says "jump"? Or why the govt uses kids gloves to china? so pls stop the nonsense. SRK and Indian govt - my advice is to show the cost of such instances to US corporations in losses and things will automatically fall in place.

From mahuahn

August 16, 2009 9:19 PM
SRK Sucks and How

From rauf sardar

August 16, 2009 9:27 PM
SRK is easily the most hypocritical star ever......Dont know why the media sucks up to him......

From rauf sardar

August 16, 2009 9:27 PM
SRK is easily the most hypocritical star ever......Dont know why the media sucks up to him......

From APPAJI

August 16, 2009 9:36 PM
You are absolutely right. Nobody is above law. Sharrukh Khan is no exception. He might be a celebrity in India that does not mean, he should be spared from security checks. With the people security becoming priority of all the other things, no body to be believed. Let Mr Shahrukh understand, that his antics are for his home but not put the nation and its people in jeopardy.

From hiten

August 16, 2009 9:37 PM
SRK is trying to make it a big deal and at the same he is indirectly promoting his new movie. The incident "might of happened" but he is playing it out to make controversy. And as you know controversy sells..

From Manish

August 16, 2009 9:38 PM
Is SRK thinking that he is VIP then he is wrong. He has to shut his mouth and not expect anybody's support on this. He should be subjected to security screening in India as well. I would appreciate the security guy who screened him.

From rajarajasen

August 16, 2009 9:39 PM
Why is everyone making such a big issue out of it. What if SRK is a mega star? Do you think barring Indians in North America, do the the whites see India movies? The guy at the airport was just doing his duty. The problem is we Indians have given the movies stars status of GOD. They should also realizde what a common man goes through, this is real life not reel life. .

From Papri

August 16, 2009 9:40 PM
Mr. Indian American, you should return back to India and see how regular Indians are being treated by other Indians... Learn to appreciate what you have.

From Mrunal Desai

August 16, 2009 9:41 PM
Very well written. Security first, and then superstars.. He is just another human being like you and me. Why make such a big issue out of it. Immigration officers were doing their job. And a superstar sharukh would try to do communal issues in india, by saying "it happened to me, because I am a Muslim". Come on dude. Everyday there are lots of indian students, H-1, green card holders who are not muslims are also investigated at the airport. That's their job and they are doing it.

From Vinod

August 16, 2009 9:42 PM
I visited USA at least 10 times and never had issues in the immigration. I urge my fellow Indians to stop making noise on this issue. I am sure SRK visited USA many times in the past and it did not happened before. If he was held this time, there should be a reason for that, so please stop worrying about silly issues and start worrying about many other issues India has to deal with.

From Nikunja Chennia

August 16, 2009 9:42 PM
The whole episode is publicity stunt by Shahrukh for his latest movie 'My Name is Khan". … Such people are disgrace to whole world who plays religion card, race card, country card to achieve own narrow, selfish goal. … Americans are true epitome of patriotism. Indian people have a lot to learn from Americans about what duty is.

From melvin frnanades

August 16, 2009 9:44 PM
Salman has a point. SRK might be an icon to Indians and many in the subcontinent, even to the desi diaspora spread across the globe, but to America he’s just a visitor. We may be convinced he cannot be involved in anything that’s remotely violent, but the guard given the responsibility of stopping something like 9/11 from happening in his country again will want to take no chances. And what is the possibility that he’s a die hard fan of the Khan and Bollywood? Very slim. The Security of the country at large if more important than Mr Sharuk Khan who is only there for his personal interest. There is no need to make a big fuss about it. May be he is doing it for his own intentions "my name is mr.khan"

From joe davis

August 16, 2009 9:46 PM
I've admired India for many years. It looks like they have their share of short sighted egomaniacs as we do. We even have U.S. Senators that make the LIST and are taken out of line. We check babies and their carriages. Of all the peoples that are bombed every day, Indians should understand everyone's desire to be safe. I am disappointed in India.

From Mir hassan

August 16, 2009 9:48 PM
Salman Khan is right. US immigration officials have every right to detain anyone. That is how US stays terror free. Celebs or no celebs! OR is it a pubblicity stunt for: "my name is......"

From prasan

August 16, 2009 9:51 PM
It seems most of the people are ignorant of US immigration rules. One of the rule is "Granting visa doesn't mean you will be allowed to enter US, immigration officer has right to over ride the visa", so it is the responsibility of the traveler to satisfy the immigration officer with documents and answering to his questions. Per US customs this SRK episode took just 1 hr, why it is being highlighted as 2 hr?. It is pity that many ministers are making comment on this issue when they have real duty to do in the wake of swine flu. There will not be any surprise if prime minster makes comments on this, losing his sleep. :) I don't feel sorry to say this the complete film fraternity is ignorant and some what arrogant on this episode.

From hemant kumar

August 16, 2009 9:55 PM
Why is this such a big news ? And who is Shah Rukh Khan ? Why he and many of his fans thinks that he should be treated differently ? Let us not forget that security of nation is much more important then individual. I do not see anything wrong on he being detained. If he is not doing anything wrong he has nothing to worry.

From hemant kumar

August 16, 2009 9:57 PM
Why is this such a big news ? And who is Shah Rukh Khan ? Why he and many of his fans thinks that he should be treated differently ? Let us not forget that security of nation is much more important then individual. I do not see anything wrong on he being detained. If he is not doing anything wrong he has nothing to worry.

From ryan parthasarathy

August 16, 2009 9:59 PM
am IT Executive doing business development in the US for the last 20 years. Prior to 9/11 on some of my trips we would get pulled for some extra scrutiny or some extra checking - we are in someone's country - we obey the process. Post 9/11 we have no choice but to obey the law, process and the moods of the TSA officials. If we get angry it will worsen the situation and hold up another two flights. Go thru it. Of the 200 odd flights I do a year - I get detained or scrutinized in 2 at the max. Granted I do not have a KHAN name. But at the end of the day we look similar (Paks, Arabs, Indians). The govt. official does not have the subtly to distinguish us. Leave alone recognize Shah Rukh. Even if he does - is Shah Rukh not human. I guess not. Should have a different process of check in for him. Shah Rukh get to politics, become a prime minister (even they get stopped like Abdul Kalam) and stop visiting foreign countries. Stay in India where your boot gets licked and you are unduly worshipped. Dont even try to make headlines out of this. Frankly tired of hearing on Shah Rukh. How come we don;t hear on other stars so much. SRK's PR is working way too hard and it is starting to backfire. Get some humility SRK.

From Andhrabhoja

August 16, 2009 10:52 PM
Hahaa...you little hypocrite scared of the truth and deleted my comment..I already told you..go get a life!

From Ammar

August 16, 2009 11:07 PM
yes you got it right, nobody cares if Bob Dylan is detained. All this is only because he is SRK. why you silly man is talking about it BECAUSE OF SRK.

From raj

August 16, 2009 11:22 PM
i think Sarukh is making a big deal out of it.The checking and detention was the regular procedures.May be he is trying to media attention for his new movie.US has every right to protect its citizens and people, there is nothing wrong with that.Cheap politicians and film stars who break rules and laws every now and then demand special treatment. These ahole treatment they might only get in their home country.

From Melissa A. Bell

August 17, 2009 12:09 AM
Really interesting to see all this response. Definitely an interesting conversation. Here's another question someone raised: is this all too convenient? Could this be a publicity stunt? Not sure if American security would go in for it, since it paints them in a bad light, but could SRK acted a bit indigent in the hopes of getting detained? I don't really think so, but would kind of be a genius marketing move.

@Andhrabhoja, feel free to say what you like. Just do not use any sexual slurs or profanity. Those are immediately removed.

From naveedzonline

August 17, 2009 12:14 AM
SRK has the right to speak to the media, he is the millions of heart, and in no way he had done any wrong or mistake to detain him unnecessarily, SRK himself said the US officials are unprofessional way of treating to him.. Well i don't think so he is just a character.. he is a man with lots of admiration, humbleness, dignity for over the years. well he is not just a character like you..stupid blog by the author.

From Rakesh Mehra

August 17, 2009 12:43 AM
For folks who think this is a publicity stunt, I wasn't aware the US's security is up for sale for cheap. And for folks who think this is not a big deal, I wish you many such incidents of detainment without any reason whatsoever. May you enjoy your detentions. For all those from the sub-continent, staying in the US, and feeling greatly indebted to that country - good for you. But remember, a solution to what has just happened would also have benefitted you. Too bad you want to be frisked each time you travel. And one point to be noted. SRK DID NOT INFORM THE MEDIA ABOUT THIS INCIDENT. THE F&%#^ING MEDIA FOUND THIS STORY OUT. Not sure about folks who say this is not abnormal, but these things do hurt. I have felt bad about being detained for questioning in my own country, I can't even imagine how it should be in an unknown land. One reason I have stayed away from the US.

From indianlass

August 17, 2009 12:47 AM
Shahrukh is riding the crest of fame being in a diverse, tolerant India. I take offense at the reader who said that his secretary was let off being Hindu. As a Hindu who travels frequently, I have stood in security lines all over the world, especially the US, waiting for my husband to join me. I am thankful to the security agents who have to do this thankless job so we can live in a safe world. Does my family feel offended? On the contrary, we are thankful. Shahrukh takes a lot for granted, the fanbase in India, the Islamic support across the globe, cutting through races. However, he is a citizen of the world, and needs to follow the rules. I think America is one of the most welcoming places in the world, just like India where a multicultural population flourish and build their own identities. I am thankful for that, and just as a coin has two faces, Shahrukh must take his huge privilege with the other side; responsibility. His juvenile, entitled reaction has taken away all the goodwill I had of him.

From val

August 17, 2009 12:50 AM
le fait que shahrukh khan ai été arrété est peut etre anodin banal ou pas de quoi en faire un drame pour vous mais si le fait qu'il en parle puisse ne serait ce assouplir les conditions de " détention" de milliers de personnes qui se font arréter aux Etats Unis et ainsi d'etre traité avec un certain respect car chaque personne ai considéré innocente jusqu'à preuve du contraire, bravo à shahruhkh khan de faire voir que la sécurité d'accord mais n'oublions pas les droits et ce n'est pas de sa faute si dans son pays il y a des injustices il en existe dans d'autre aussi meme chez moi en France et l'on va pas lui faire payer les erreurs de nous tous s'il montre du doigt une injustice et que cela peut apporter un mieux ben je dis vas y mon gars je suis derrière toi

From Mihir

August 17, 2009 1:10 AM
Check out this blog for a better perspective on the incident “My Name is Khan…Shahrukh Khan”: Profiling or Promotion? August 16, 2009 Filed under: Uncategorized — swapnilrai @ 7:05 pm By Swapnil Rai The media is overflowing with reports of how Shahrukh Khan, “King of Bollywood” was detained at the airport in the United States. The New York Times reports the incident as “Questioning a Bollywood V.I.P. Named Khan” while The Times of India headline reads “SRK detained at US airport for being a Khan”. The incident is covered by all major news and media networks around the world ranging from AP, AFP and Reuters to BBC and The Australian. The alleged incident of racial profiling had led to fervent demands to the US embassy in India to issue apologies to Khan. Although such incidents of racial profiling might not be uncommon in the US but a global celebrity like Shahrukh Khan being subject to such treatment especially at a time when he has just finished a movie about racial profiling points to the likelihood of this event possibly being a carefully devised promotional strategy. Notice the verbiage that Khan is quoted as using in explaining the incident to the Indian media, “I was really hassled perhaps because of my name being Khan” (Reuters). The film that Khan completed is titled “My Name is Khan” and was filmed mostly in the US. It is also important to point out that Khan recently appeared at the Golden Globes award function to present Slumdog Millionaire, so he does have the stature of a global celebrity even in the US and is frequent traveler to the United States. Therefore, it is unlikely that he would be detained just because “his name is Khan” unless his publicists wanted that for him ?? Kevin Corsaro, a spokesman for United States Customs and Border Protection was quoted by the New York Times saying that Khan’s inspection, “lasted a little more than an hour”. “Unfortunately, Mr. Khan’s checked luggage was lost by the airline, which contributed to his delay during C.B.P. processing” (qtd. in NY Times). The incident highlights the fact that perhaps too much is being made out of a routine security check. The reason could well be Khan’s upcoming film that is slated for a global launch in 2010 and US is one of the primary target markets. This incident and its coverage by the global media has created a buzz around not just the subject but Shahrukh Khan as well. This event might just be a way to introduce Khan to the mainstream US audiences. Khan’s introduction is important and essential in the light of the fact that Hollywood’s Fox Studio’s reportedly pegged USD 21 million deal for worldwide distribution rights for Khan’s film. Bollywood armed with its global ambition and Hollywood seeking to leverage the cost effective success formula that Bollywood offers, have come together to promote and find global markets for films like “My Name is Khan”. The new genre of Bollywood-Hollywood collaboration that this film represents has moved beyond clichéd romances onto subjects that would attract a global audience. So, unlike the promotional announcements of a budding romance between the lead actors of an upcoming movie which had been the norm so far (Recall recent media reports of Shahid Kapur and Priyanka Chopra romance for their upcoming film Kaminey) it seems that global Bollywood’s publicists have moved on to more relevant subjects and “cleverer” promotional strategies. In keeping with the Bollywood trend, there is a possibility that the racial profiling event is just an attempt to promote Khan’s upcoming global release “My Name is Khan” by projecting his onscreen persona onto his real life. Profiling or Promotion? Which P is it? I’ll let the readers decide but I sincerely hope it is the latter. The author Swapnil Rai is a writer, journalist and media professional. Her work and research focusses on globalization, Indian Cinema, media convergence and media and public culture. She can be reached at swapnilrai@gmail.com

From naina

August 17, 2009 1:31 AM
I have always loved salman for what he is............he doesnt care a shit about diplomacy, he is neither hypocrate like many are.........he says what he feels......kudos to him and offcourse mellisa for this wonderful article

From borad

August 17, 2009 1:33 AM
What's so big deal? Who is he? He is just a human being and every human being to be trated in a same manner? This is unfortunate that Indian mantality is not changed yet. Every celebrity,rich people,politician think that they should be treated like god. If you fly by Ait India and if your name is in special catagory, they act like big shot and move around in cockpit and can act like anything. Mr PRaful Patel you've change so many thing in aviation point of veiw but you would not be able to change this stupid mantality.

From najaf ali mirza

August 17, 2009 1:34 AM
am sure srk must have behaved in an arrogant, king khan manner with the concerned authorities at the US. We INDIANS/Media are responsible to take him to the perch of mount Everest by calling him "kingkhan" (which he is not) Dimag Kharab Kar Diya uska. Had he approached the authorities in decent clothes (instead of sporting torn jeans), with a smile on his face and in a polite manner, things wud have been very different and positive. No one in the world likes arrogant people who think they are God....

From soumya

August 17, 2009 1:35 AM
salman and mellissa rock

From bryan

August 17, 2009 1:36 AM
Excellently written. In a TOI article it was noted that SRK was 2 hours late for his performance at the Taj Mahal hotel in Atlantic City - implying Newark's immigration was at fault due to his detention for two hours. Amusing!!!! And rings of BS, if I do say so myself. Since when did his organizers plan to SRK be present instantly at Atlantic City upon his arrival at the airport? Normal human beings need at least 8 hours rest after arriving their flight from London on British Airways. Nice FREE publicity for his movie....which I will not be seeing.

From vorshal

August 17, 2009 1:37 AM
What nonsense? SRK, that was shameful, yes, on your part! They would apply law on any person from any other religion or by any other name. Don't fish for free publicity. It looked so cheaaaap! Frankly, you pass by on the sidewalk, and perhaps, we won't even look at you! Hope you get the message!

From vinay

August 17, 2009 1:37 AM
Govt. of India ,its ministers and also the media is downgrading the status of India in the eyes of the world by giving unnecessary importance to such a toothless news. Sharuk is under illusion that he is treated like a god all over the world. It is not his fault but the people of India themselves by devoting the actors/actress who have no use for India except to rob the common people. Govt. Of India should have implemented the strict immigration system thus it could have prevented terrorist attacks ,instead it is just wasting time.

From vinay

August 17, 2009 1:38 AM
Govt. of India ,its ministers and also the media is downgrading the status of India in the eyes of the world by giving unnecessary importance to such a toothless news. Sharuk is under illusion that he is treated like a god all over the world. It is not his fault but the people of India themselves by devoting the actors/actress who have no use for India except to rob the common people. Govt. Of India should have implemented the strict immigration system thus it could have prevented terrorist attacks ,instead it is just wasting time.

From kumar

August 17, 2009 1:39 AM
It is stupid for the Indian government to carry green flag in to support of SRK and antagonise US security.

From india

August 17, 2009 1:39 AM
well it is not a small thing because he is a big star and he got his links. Think about if it was a Normal Shahrukh who wasnt a supper star. The US would have taken him to Gitmo Jail (getting closed) and u wouldve never heard from him again. There are so many people who have gone through racism. Its easy to sit here and comment but it scares the Fish of of you when u are in the situation urself. The US immigration just wants to make hard for muslims to travel to US after the unfortunate thing happened and no one knows who did it yet. Proud to be Muslim Canadian. It is just funny people acting big on sites when they know if God forbid this happens to them they will shit there pants and cry like a lil baby. Salman is just a little immature 43 year old kid trying to inform the world that is mature now.

From matt

August 17, 2009 1:41 AM
Just grow up Shahrukh... People like him are so used to getting pempered and treated like "King" in "democratic" country like India. Though, we all know, there are no kings & queens in India. And, from there stems this childish moaning of his likes... I am very sure, and hopeful at the same time, that this incident will teach the likes of him, that rule of law is above and beyond everyone. And, you better leave-off your spoiled behaviour in India only.

From praveen mookoni

August 17, 2009 1:42 AM
This is the height of vanity. I do not understand what he is upset about. Is he not like any other individual chosen for questioning. How being a star will exempt him from being questioned. Shame on him for making an issue about nothing. This is no doubt a publicity stunt for his new movie.

From ben

August 17, 2009 1:44 AM
I guess "acting" facilitates megalomania and leaves the actors with withdrawal symptoms when they are not "acting." Its an irony that these shallow chaps expect life to be a breeze and cannot differentiate real life from movies. SRFingK has to realise he is mortal and stop being above himself. Would he have kicked up a row if this had happened to him before he shot to stardom? No! Well, perhaps Yes to milk it for what its worth - promoting himself. SRK is foolish and should be incarcerated for frittering away our time and energy, and not to mention, the news slots where instead some worthy information could have been relayed. SRK sux bigtime!

From james

August 17, 2009 1:45 AM
please end this khan episode,who is shahrukh khan by the way, he is known only to indians,outside world doesnot know him,he happens to be a ordinary man, so he was checked, anyway iam with the us,rules are rules,wen u r in different country u shud follow the rules,so next time shah rukh wen u r caught in us airport, do some nasty tricks that u show in your film.....

From abhi

August 17, 2009 1:47 AM
Very obvious publicity stunt for his upcoming movie. shame SRK indulges in this cheap antics. SRK focus on acting not on cheap publicity stunts. US is doing a good job, they do not want Mumbai sort of massacre. And why shouldnt an indian celbrity get frisked? by the same reason Sunjay Dutt can walk into the US with AK 47's, Mandakini, dawoods keep can sneak into the US. Celebrity or not, learn to go through the security check.

From salman_wanted

August 17, 2009 1:48 AM
salman rules

From max

August 17, 2009 1:49 AM
TRUELY SAID.. THE SO CALLED SELF STYLED GLOBAL ICONS THRIVING IN INDIA SHOULD KNOW 'BOUT THE RIGOUROUS PROCEDURES THAT'VE TO BE FOLLOWED BY IMMIGRATION/PASSPORT OFFICIALS.. SAFETY AND SECURITY OF EVERY CITIZEN IS PARAMOUNT IN USofA..SO MR KHAN DON'T MAKE SO MUCH NOISE.. SOONER OR LATER INDIAN OFFICIALS TOO WILL TAKE NOTE OF SECURITY SCENARIO AND THEN U SHOULD NOT BE SHOCKED.. IT IS A GOOD TEACHING FOR INDIAN OFFICIALS "WORSHIP THE DUTY NOT THE ICONS"...

From sonny

August 17, 2009 1:51 AM
Lame publicity stunt by Mr. Khan...He comes to US 10 times a year and never had any issue with the security. I am not sure why an Indian star thinks every American is aware that he is a star and should bow down to him. Or maybe Mr. Kahn is pissed that he wasn't put up ahead of the line for checkup as it would be done in India for him. Even worse to see corrupt Indian politicians tripping over themselves to side with Mr. Kahn. If India would treat everybody same as they mostly do in the US it wouldn't be attacked by terrorists as often as it does get attacked...

From gopal

August 17, 2009 1:52 AM
Nice blog, but who is he?

From arvind

August 17, 2009 1:53 AM
Be realistic SRK, don't bring shame to India by your own act. You may be VIP in India, how come a CBP official knows you? Leave your Indian attitude of VIP title and be realistic. Even US senators and Vice-presidents are were checked by CBP earlier, how come you are better than those for US? How come US BSP folks can remember VIPs list from 220 countries in the world? Angelina and Brad are international figures, you are just part of sub-continent. SRK, you finally lost your respect and can not carry your value any longer.... you should apologize to India and US as well.

From suresh ahluwalia

August 17, 2009 1:55 AM
For all this brouha in the media and also in the public and government circles , I condemn SRK who started it all. Who the hell does he think he is? He is just an actor (whatever his name) - perhaps a successful one for Indian audiences. That is about it. Even the Nobel Laureates and the VVIP's in America are treated the same way at airpors and you cannot bypass the procedures laid down and the discretion of the man on the spot doing his job, by any "bhai-bandi" or hollering about your assumed status. I condemn SRK's character for being peeved and starting a "racket" in such a situation The attitude of Indians and so called VIP's and celebrites is "samne se hato, jante nahin, main kon hoon?" and expect special treatments. ALL this MUST stop. Play cool and follow the rules wherever you go whether within India or abroad. And have a little sense of humour. Ambiks Soni's outburst is even more ridiculous than SRK's attituide. India and Indians are reputed worldwide to be hospitable and tolerant of foreigners and their antics - and foreign celeberities are "fawned" over. What is she going to achieve by interposing her stupidity as a Minisier of Central Govt and destroying the genuine Indian ethos of tolerance and hospitality towards foreigners?

From rahulaaj

August 17, 2009 1:56 AM
love you salman bro........your statement shows ur maturity

From najaf ali khan

August 17, 2009 1:59 AM
it is crystal clear (after reading all those views) in detail. Took me a long time to read each and every comments. It is confirmed that this is just a publicity stunt created by srk for his forthcoming film khan...blah blah. He has fallen from my eyes. I have promised myself that i will never see his face or his film again ... in my life.. By playing religious *** politics *** advertisement.... he has hurt my sentiment and i have lost all my respect and regard for him. Shame.

From anjan roy

August 17, 2009 2:00 AM
I think the "big shots" in India can stay in India if they feel that the US discriminates against them. I don't think we would miss anything. I am sick and tired of all these so called "stars" expecting a VIP treatement everywhere they go. That's why India is still stuck in the slow lane. In the US, people play is by the books and try their best to follow the principle: "All men are created equal." Just because you know a bit of acting does not make you a "star". Let's treat everyone equally. If SRK or some other star do not like this, well, stay home!

From majire

August 17, 2009 2:04 AM
is there so little real news in India that some self important buffoon's hissy fit deserves headline coverage? What a relief to read some common-sense commentary. To stress that the idea SRK faced discrimination because he has a Muslim name is rubbish. Most Americans (and I am one myself) only recognize Khan as a foreign name. Until I married an Indian I never would have known the difference. And for what it's worth, my 81 year old American mother gets as much or more attention from airport security than my Indian husband when we travel. Can someone please tell me about any Al-Qaeda trained geriatric terrorist? Racial profiling? Discrimination against Muslims? Spare me.

From hawkeye

August 17, 2009 2:05 AM
Has anyone noticed that from the hundreds of comments, those supporting SRK can be counted on the fingers of ones hands. 99% plus indict SRK as being pompous. One can only hope the foreign ministry will take no action except to remind SRK that if he chooses to travel abroad, he will have to abide by the rules of that country. He does have the option of staying put in his beloved and adulating Bandra !!

From R Ganguly

August 17, 2009 2:06 AM
Shah Rukh is not such a spacial person like PM of a country that he expects a special treatment at US air port security dept. After all US has to protect their country from any untowards incident after 9/11. Unlike India, in the name of any Tom Dick and Harry, security of the country is compromised. It is unfortunate that our Civil Aviation minister Praful Patel wants to take up this issue with US aviation authority.

From Satendra Negi

August 17, 2009 2:06 AM
wat the hell man is tat officer alnoe without any help of other other were vouching fro him but tis officer was not at all convinced n y didnt he just searched in google abt his name when many came to him for his autographs? ther are 301100 pages abt him in google tat officer should be fired they just wanted to em him shame on tat officer srk is one of the 50 most powerful man in the world huh....................... Americans are idiots they wanted to insult him. if Indians do the same thing with Bradd pitt or some other hollywood star thn they wud had made it a bigger issue attacks to india me bhi hote hai why the hell we dont interrogate americans coming to india??

From roshini

August 17, 2009 2:08 AM
I am a fan of SRK but this whole issue has been blown out of proportion. Why couldn't he tolerate that he is a common man in a foreign country and he would have to face such situations like millions of us in the present light. I stay in US and its a common procedure for people of any caste, creed, color or religion to be interogated to such an extent in a foreign country. Why get fussy that it cant happen to you just because you are a celebrity. It was his reponsibility to maintain his cool and calmn. what message is he sending across people of india...

From john

August 17, 2009 2:10 AM
Until this article showed up on an errored google search.........I had never heard of Shahrukh Khan. I suspect the same of the immigration agent at the airport. Also, if his name showed up on a list, or anyone's name for that matter, then he or she is going to receive extra scrutiny from immigration. If you don't like it, then don't go to the United States.

From kaushik kumar

August 17, 2009 2:13 AM
A country where the chiefs of armed forces are frisked, while Robert Vadera is exempt, should not comment when SRK is frisked in a foreign country, where he is "John Q Visitor". If all security agencies do random checks, irrespective of the person, it will go a long way in assuring the security of everyone. When Bob Dylan, who has much greater fan coverage than SRK, can be stpped and questioned, why not SRK?

From nilesh

August 17, 2009 2:14 AM
Very well written.If SRK feels he shld not be frisked he shld change his name then or take a vow not to visit US again.Just trying to gain cheap publicity.Who knows if he is involved directly or indirectly with some kind of activities.Media also should cut to size these kind of news.Government seems to be pretty free to argue on this kind of cheap publicity stunts.If he has called Rajeev Shukla on a personal basis why is the Indian government creating a hue n cry?Seems for SRk these kind of cheap publicity stunts are the only means to go ahead in the bollywood after failing drastically in the TV world and the IPL.Grow up SRK.

From adwit

August 17, 2009 2:16 AM
What the heck! Why waste time and energy over a trivial issue like this. Ex Prsident Kalam's frisking incident was just dusted under the carpet. And just who is Shahrukh Khan to the Americans - just another visitor! Let's not make a mountain of a mole hill.

From thebird

August 17, 2009 2:17 AM
Wondering why SRK has not sugggested about Indian American war?

From Upendra Brahmbhatt

August 17, 2009 2:19 AM
Shahrukh Khan seems to make the issue out of such common security check by US officials. A person like our Ex-president Hon.Abdul Kalam had handled the situation so calmly with lots of restrains and did not issue any statement, while Mr.Khan is trying to project himself more than VVIP.

From davidjohnson

August 17, 2009 2:20 AM
I'm a U.S. citizen. My name is David Johnson. I'm tall and white as can be and I've been detained for questioning THREE times at airports. Why? Because my name is so common that it's suspicious. Silly? Yes indeed. It just goes to show you're not alone in being detained. You're not being singled out, EVERYONE is suspicious. It's a hassle to take 45 minutes out of your journey to sit in a room while they ask you a few dumb questions, but such is life in the 21st Century. Welcome to the future. So...can we move on to more pressing issues now?

From prateek tapliyal

August 17, 2009 2:23 AM
Very well opined. The law of the land supercedes all issues.Shahrukh Khan seems to be unduly upset on the issue and the same has been blatantly negated by him.Since when has he started to feel for the muslims worldwide?It's a good reality check for our pampered superstars.Kudos to you

From bulkesh

August 17, 2009 2:28 AM
Eventhough Salman has his own ways.....he seems to be a people's person unlike srk who seems to be a megalomania.....one with a huge ego

From Nonn E. Mouse

August 17, 2009 2:37 AM
First of all, a note to Delton Betjamin: You should be ashamed of yourself. What do you think you're achieving with that kind of comment -- showing the rest of the world the best of India? As to the incident and the vitriol spewed by some commenters here. The author is absolutely right. As much as racial profiling itself sucks, people need to realise two things: 1) If a law exists, it must apply across the board. The fame or non-fame of a person is completely irrelevant. Yes, that's a tricky point to make when the law itself does not apply to everybody to begin with, but even so: celebrity is a non-issue. 2) Even if celebrity were a factor: I realise that Shahrukh Khan is a celebrity in India, but he is not all that well-known outside of India. That may be news to you, but it's a fact. There are two groups of people in the US (and the rest of the world) who would know him: people in the film industry and people who are into Bollywood movies as a hobby; the latter group is very, very small, and both taken together are STILL a tiny minority. Pick 20 people outside of India, on any street, and you'll be lucky of one or two have ever heard of him. You cannot expect border security to know every national celebrity of every country in the world. Think about this for a few minutes. Pick a country. Say, Italy. Now name all the famous Italian actors you know. Now try it for antoher country. Norway, for example. Again, name all the famous Norwegian actors you know. Now think about whether you would excuse an Indian border security employee for not knowing every celebrity of that country. Now think about whether you wouldn't be amused at the citizens of Italy or Norway being outraged at you (or the security guard) not knowing such trivial things. Think, get over yourself, get some perspective.

From daniya

August 17, 2009 3:06 AM
i agree....no big deal...people are making a scene out of it...just bcuz SRK is famous doesn't mean he shouldn't get a security check...and Indian Meadia is a lotttt worst than stupid...they do shit to make things sound worst than they are... Salman is right..No big deal... After all we all have to face the facts that Muslims have caused hella trouble in the past( Yes, i am a Muslim too..Living in U.S.A with a last name KHAN)... and for all the people blaming America of this should also know that SRK also gets a lot of respect in these countires too...its just this one time they did a security check on him...NO BIG DEAL, NO BIG DEAL... I DON'T WHY WHY ARE PEOPLE ARE GETTING SOO FRIKIN EMOTIONAL ABOUT THIS... GET REALLL!!!

From M S

August 17, 2009 3:31 AM
Ok, This is indeed not something uncommon. I lived in the US for 6 years for my graduate studies 00-03 and 05-08. I saw how the landscape changed after 9/11. You guys should do a google and look up the NSEERS program. Regardless of my name, because of my age, religion and nationality, despite being a frequent traveler, I had to go through this EVERY SINGLE time I entered the US. And yes, you have to register your exit too, else, you shall not be allowed back into the country. The "special registration" even involves a wallet search and an officer enters all your bank accounts, credit cards, and every single thing he can find into the "system". Do I agree with it? No. Do I just follow the crap with my head down and keep a 4 hour window between my inbound flight into the US and the connecting flight? ALWAYS. When you want to enter a country, you follow their laws. There is no other choice. Coming to US was a choice by SRK, not something he was forced to do. Racial / Religious profiling happens all over the world and it is a reality of life. US is no different.

From rajat

August 17, 2009 4:26 AM
I think this is just cheat publicity for hie next film "My name is khan" and thats why they did it...otherwise how many times he came to Us and never happen before and now suddenly in this time when his movie is coming soon this is happen. That is really sucks. I hope this what i am think is not truth ...otherwise he will suffer for this cheat publicity ...

From aiglenoire

August 17, 2009 4:28 AM
it's not about srk as a person but as an indian .so when you indian didnt feel upset about that really you are ..........even salman khan has changed his opinion about the incident. i m not indian (morroco)and i was chocked as amslim .but you indian you must be hurt because he is INDIAN before muslim.we all know about american gouvernement and his racism ,and i m surt that american are upset and desappointed about what happen to srk.so i think who has written this article is a big jalous of king khan and he wait just a opportunity to write rabbish .the writter is hindu but not indian.and in the same event we must be a good citizen .let religion out of this we all its not muslim who do that.and america starts to loose her power .and if you see the news and real actuallity even the epidemie of n1h1 is mad by usa in order to botch indian medecine :tameflu.and this just to get out of crise usa do not care if people dies if she get out of crise.so grow up and see clearly and deeply in usa's politic

From Ram P. Singh

August 17, 2009 4:36 AM
Awesome blog!!! Exactly my sentiments!!

From Sunil

August 17, 2009 7:02 AM
This is a well written article. SRK should sop flogging this dead horse and apologize on behalf of all Indians for bringing a disrepute all Indians. SRK, try to be a normal person by obeying the laws of the land, wherever you are. US enforces its security laws pretty thoroughly, and as an Indian who lives in New York and saw 911 happen right before my eyes, I am proud of how this nation is trying to protect its residents. Believe me king Khan, your 2 hours of discomfort is nothing compared to the lives of millions of people US security procedures are trying to save. Get a life man!

From Chandrashekhar

August 17, 2009 7:06 AM
I would like to thank the immigration officer for bringing this megalomaniac SRK to the ground, make him realize- he is an ordinary alien in other country. Why should he expect VIP treatment, when it comes to security matters? He invited for himself by telling the officer, "My name is Khan." If Shahrukh is smart (or cute) enough, I hope, he has learnt his lesson. He mentioned, he is reluctant to go to USA. Let him stop going there and see, whose loss will it be anyway? In US, they care little for their own celebrities, when it comes to security. Why should they care for a celebrity of a third world country with a muslim last name? Isn't the connection of bollywood actoors with underworld well known in India? How about an ordinary Rafiq Khan or Mushtaq Khan meets with such treatment? Why don't anyone raise their voice then? They are also citizens of India.

From quark

August 17, 2009 7:15 AM
To the writer of the insinuating article: If you throw mud at people, you only reveal your poor upbringing. May god bless you.

From Abhishek

August 17, 2009 7:35 AM
Nice article Melissa. I would like to put my points: 1. Was it racial profiling? Perhaps. That is unacceptable. 2. Was it wrong to go for secondary check due to name being popped up? NO 3. Why was Shahrukh or SRK as he is known upset? He was upset because he thought he was seen by Indians and Pakistanis that he (SRK) is being asked for secondary check.No other reason he sighted. 4. Are bollywood actors free of crimes? Well you may want to check Sanjay Dutt - father was an actor turned MP, well grounded to reality. Mother was leading actress of her time. Sanjay Dutt was convicted of carrying AK-47 during riots in Mumbai. More than half of Bollywood actors have underworld link inlcuding Dawood Ibrahim, who is a wanted terrorist by FBI. If I were that officer, I would have done exactly what he did. 5. Attitude? You do not show attitude in a foreign nation. (Applies to americans too). Just shut up and comply if it is not unreasonable. 6. Security: I have been frisked on US soil. I do not regret that. It is part of job of officer. What I detest is getting checkers everytime I fly and perhaps no one else gets it. That surely is wrong. So my conclusion is that system is flawed, even though intent is good. And we need to fix it rather than discuss non issues like SRK being detained. I am surprised that no one in India ever said anything about Continental Airlines who frisked an ex-president on Indian soil! And now they are making big noise here. Wait wait wait - it is all politics - that president came from right wing BJP and SRK is a supporter of ruling Congress party who loves to appease right wing muslims for votes.

From pat

August 17, 2009 7:51 AM
to the writer while I agree that security is necessary when monitoring those travelling to your country. there is a natural acceptance that Muslims are responsible for for 9/11 when no clear proof has been put forward only speculation.many people have to go through these demeaning searches and experience high level of embarrassment to visit the US.maybe this event will highlight the type of policy that the US has been using freely without question from other countries. to Mr Khan and other who have suffered the same fate i'm sorry. it's sad when we are judged by our name, our colour or our religion

From myname is khan

August 17, 2009 8:01 AM
From john August 17, 2009 2:10 AM Until this article showed up on an errored google search.........I had never heard of Shahrukh Khan. - You are ignorant. So what?

From Surprised at lowly article

August 17, 2009 8:23 AM
Who is this Shahrukh Khan character anyway? - very balanced indeed. What is livemint anyway? what a writer is in livemint anyway? The answer to all these questions is that livemint and the writer of this article make their living by writing about the celebrities. Some have commented that Shahrukh has said that he was a film star and his name was khan. Is that wrong? Should he say I'm a programmer from Infosys? My name is Chandrasekhar? Some people commented that Shahrukh should have ignored it. That's ordinary people do. Shahrukh does not. That's why he is special, not an ordinary creature like you with 2 legs and 2 hands, with questionable material inside your cortex. Interestingly the author knows Salman, and not Sharukh. Despite I like Salman, I don't find merit in questioning for 66 minutes. To all not so ignorants, if you happen to have heard about a guy named Brad Pitt, would take it kindly if he is picked up as terrorist suspect for questioning at New Delhi airport by indian officials? Be honest.

From Salauddeen

August 17, 2009 8:32 AM
There are a lot of criminals and ex-jailbirds amongst the acting profession! So they do need extra scrutiny. Just because Indians cannot be bothered to prosecute such "celebrity" criminals should not give them any privilege when they visit my home country!!!

From ordinary guy

August 17, 2009 8:45 AM
Who is this Shahrukh Khan character anyway? He is a famous filmstar who is smart, articulate, rich, earns millions every film, and bestowed highest honor by a foreign country. how many of livemint authors?

From RDX

August 17, 2009 8:57 AM
You shalt never say any wrong about Indian Film stars...They are demi gods...Ha Ha Ha

From Storyteller

August 17, 2009 9:08 AM
Crow khan was a crow but he got US citizenship. He loved his new country very much. He was happy to be in USA, and added a peacock's tail to his own, just to look rich and sexy. Oneday he decided to visit his original country to see his relatives, and, secretly in his mind to show off. All the crow relatives were so impressed. He told them stories about USA, particularly about tight security of TSA in the airport. He also told them that he reads livemint everyday. All relatively were impressed again and again. satisfied, the crow decided to return. He boarded the plane to Chicago, in economy class. Fortunately, the relatives does not care which class he is travelling. Crow was proud and happy to have made a great show-off. He thought he was so lucky to be in USA. However, the airhostess did not like the crow, despite him wearing a peacock's tail. She told the captain to get rid of the crow. Since then crow khan lives in his original country, without the added tail, because it was heavy and useless.

From Rohidas

August 17, 2009 9:15 AM
No Man is bigger than Law. If it was SRK so what. This has become a mountain out of molehill because he is celebrity. Celebrity status should not stop from being detained but it surely helps getting a lot of attention. May celebreties use their status to attract attention related to severe grim situations faced by the vast country like India.

From Run of the mill

August 17, 2009 9:39 AM
I support detention, particularly of the celebrities. I am a run of the mill and that's my revenge. That brings me to the level of the celebrities.

From Abhishek Sharma

August 17, 2009 9:40 AM
This is not a the first brush with law for Mr. Khan. Mr. Khan was investigated for Mumbai Blasts 1993 by Indian police and intelligence agency for having ties with an international terrorist (Mr. Dawood Ibrahim) and was slapped by then SP R.C. Sharma after he denied any relationship with Mr. Ibrahim or with ISI. US Immigration must have done a due diligence which indian agencies and government has not done for past 15 years. To be noted, Mr. Khan was relived by indian police only after the politically motivated intervention of the central government headed by Congress party. If Mr. Khan would not trigger a security threat, who would ? Do not expect other countries to be as lame as India is.

From Hindu

August 17, 2009 9:59 AM
It drives me nut that most hindus in india adores khan and his wife is a hindu. All hindus should support the Newark airport officials and malign khan as much as possible.

From sakiv

August 17, 2009 10:13 AM
Dear Blogger you got it all wrong. The question is not that the Shahrukh khan was detained, the question here is that a person who happens to be one of the biggest movie star of India was detained because of his skin color and his surname. Now you can ask me how do i know this. well I know this from my personal experience. Like many of fellow brown colored men and women I have been plucked out too many times out of security check lines for special security checks.

From nitjana

August 17, 2009 10:19 AM
That's ok for few of the people like above to sympathize with the American Airport officials. Of course no one is above the law and the security checks are meant for all, after all it is meant to improve the security factor for everybody isn't it. I mean security checks are not meant to degrade or belittle anyone right? But what the point of contention here is not about super star status, especial treatments etc, it is about what is necessary and what is excesses. Detaining for 2 hrs a Bollywood star is taking this Security Paranoia very much far. Are American Security personnel so DUMB. Then they should improve their screening and questioning procedures. Last time they made former president Abdul Kalam Azad remove his shoes. OK America takes its security very seriously, point made. But it should realize that such blatant show of high handedness produces more amount of negativeness and toxicity. As a security professional myself, let me remind the great Americans that cooperative security is the best security.

From nitjana

August 17, 2009 10:20 AM
That's ok for few of the people like above to sympathize with the American Airport officials. Of course no one is above the law and the security checks are meant for all, after all it is meant to improve the security factor for everybody isn't it. I mean security checks are not meant to degrade or belittle anyone right? But what the point of contention here is not about super star status, especial treatments etc, it is about what is necessary and what is excesses. Detaining for 2 hrs a Bollywood star is taking this Security Paranoia very much far. Are American Security personnel so DUMB. Then they should improve their screening and questioning procedures. Last time they made former president Abdul Kalam Azad remove his shoes. OK America takes its security very seriously, point made. But it should realize that such blatant show of high handedness produces more amount of negativeness and toxicity. As a security professional myself, let me remind the great Americans that cooperative security is the best security.

From aa

August 17, 2009 10:24 AM
**** u Americans u abused indian Idol SRK

From Azam Ali

August 17, 2009 10:24 AM
Hi I have no problem if spotted for security checks, but when we talk about Known personalites it is very diffrent matter. He was give valid US visa, he was very well known personal, not like unkonw guy like you or me. I am sure US immigration keeps these all information on the system, so it is not case of mistaken identity as US immigration officer would instently know when key in his name on the screen. Even poeples from visa waiver country they required all information 72 hours before flights. So they already know all about you, and what they are going to do with you before your plane lended. Yet they decided to in this way with SRK could not be accident.

From Anand

August 17, 2009 10:51 AM
I am really amused by the fact that some of my fellow commenters don't have a problem with the sheer ignorance displayed by the concerned authorities. Do you mean that they can't type a name in a search engine? And this sort of incident generally happens due to the ineptitude of a single, obnoxious, ignorant person, who for reasons best known for himself or herself decides to flex / abuse their authority. And the tone of the article, which is "How dare you question us??" Well, welcome to Indian democracy. And by the way, this is nothing compared to the ruckus that could have taken place on the streets of Hyderabad or Chennai, had the concerned gentleman been Chiranjeevi or Rajnikant (2 people whom U.S. immigration might be advised getting familiar about :)))) .

From jose

August 17, 2009 11:35 AM
Melissa: Don’t you have anything better to blog than on SRK, bloody hell, u never blogged when Dr Kalam got a similar treatment that too on Indian soil. But than he never made a big issue of it and nor does he has any idiotic and moronic gals drooling all over him like they do it for SRK. No wonder that idiot think he is GOD and should be get Godly treatment. And SRK, ur not the only one dreaming of frisking Angelina Jolie, if ever such an opportunity arrives, there are over one billion guys waiting with batted breath hehehehhehehhehehehehehee. Thanks a lot to US of A for showing that idiot where he belongs. And SRK, learn from iconic figures like Dr Kalam, if you are really iconic pls try to set examples by obeying the law of the land and not by throwing tantrums. Learn you idiot, even the brat Salman got some sense though I think he said it just to take a dig at you

From Shalini

August 17, 2009 11:36 AM
Its not about somebody having an inflated ego or about how celebrities at home should be exempted from such security checks (including former president Kalam). But I would just like to see Bill Clinton being frisked in India. Or Brad Pitt and his pouting wife being detained on "security grounds"...Well, if we cant frisk Clinton, I'm sorry, you cant frisk Kalam. If the rules apply equally to all, then there is no issue at all. But this second rate treatment, so typically US.

From jose

August 17, 2009 11:41 AM
Yeah Anand, if it was Rajnikant than whole of south India would have blown up including Japan and parts of south-east Asian countries. But, knowing Rajni, i think he would have in his signature style saluted the officials and rewarded them with CDs of his latest film. He is too genuine a guy to stoop to this kind of level. But, Chiranjivee, well GOD help us, the people of Andhra would have gone on a token strike and Chiru himself would have lead the protest march to the US consulate

From jose

August 17, 2009 11:42 AM
hmmmmm Shalini, you got a point there no question about it

From Vinod

August 17, 2009 12:03 PM
Security threat has no pre-defined face now a days. No wonder a known iconic person is FORCED to do an illegal activity. If Indian authorities let Clinton or Brod Pitt enter into the country without proper security check, then they are not doing their job right. Why make noise when people do their jobs as defined? If SRK is detained for a couple of hours, it’s his personal problem and please do not treat as if it is a National problem.

From Sandi Mann

August 17, 2009 12:24 PM
you people don't realise the most important thing here: Shah Rukh didn't cause all this brouhaha for himself, it was his fans and fellow countrymen who were outraged: Shah Rukh is just the *face* of the controversy, and maybe it will lead to a more diplomatic approach for EVERYONE, so they that are not subjected to the indignity that he was. Shah Rukh said it was no biggie, and a necessary thing. It just could have been handled a LOT better.

From 24 Hour Infomercials ? – POV

August 17, 2009 12:58 PM

Pingback from  24 Hour Infomercials ? – POV

From lalitv

August 17, 2009 1:22 PM
Google Search Results : Hitler : 30 Million Idi amin: 2.6 Millions Bin Laden : 15.4 Millions Does the number on google search really qualify a a VISA into US against a security threat? I think it was a standard procedure, and blown out of proportion by media. So lets all chill and not make it into a bigger issue.

From Sania

August 17, 2009 1:30 PM
SRK remember Kalam our ex president he went through the same thing. Did he raise a hue and cry quiver his eyebrows and pout saying he was racially profiled? Did he call up all media and give min to min account and play sympathy card saying thank god my kids were not around? When ex-president with vvip clearance is questioned. who is this shah rukh khan character :D

From CarreraGT

August 17, 2009 3:44 PM
Melissa, SRK would have raised all these issues - the lack of access to health care by millions of citizens, the low literacy rate in girls living in the South, the conflicts arising from illegal immigration, the rise of hate crimes, the continued existence of laws such as "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and the Patriot Act - only if his coming movie was called "My Name is Dr.Khan" or "My Name is Prof Khan"....sadly his next release is on racial profiling, so these issues will have to wait a while. And do not doubt Mr Khan's marketing brains....thats the only thing he is brilliant at!

From Krupa Thakrar

August 17, 2009 6:54 PM
Melissa, I'm interested in having a chat with you about your possible particpation in our radio discuss on the BBC World Service today about Shahrukh Khan. Is there a number we can reach you on? Best Krupa Broadcast Journalist, BBC World Service London

From joe

August 17, 2009 10:48 PM
Shah Rukh Khan sucks. I think all this talking is really a publiity stunt for his upcoming movie 'My name is Khan'.

From My name is Ostrich

August 18, 2009 4:14 AM
Because I can be detained, I feel satisfied when Shahrukh is also detained. Not only me, I feel there are a whole lot of ostriches like me. I wonder how dare someone ask questions about security procedures. He may be the most famous actor in the world, I would trumpet my ignorance and call his actions childish.

From Andhrabhoja

August 18, 2009 5:35 AM
Oh boy! whats up with this unanimous support to the blogger. Somehow everyone of you feels empowered by thrashing celebrities "oh..who do they think? oh..are they not humans? oh why are we making a big deal about this"....Try achieving something close to what SRK achieved and then Say stuff like that"Hey I'm a celebrity, I'm not complaining"..until then..dont talk trash Instead of supporting your fellow citizen in a foreign land..you go all out to support this blogger...typical colonial mindset.. Give it a thought for a second...if a system can not differentiate between the genuine vs the suspicious, what good is that system? If this happens to SRK..what about common muslims....Instead of blaming the system and blatant US highhandedness...whats up with your knee jerk support...you guys a disgrace to INDIA.. Jai Hind

From Melissa A. Bell

August 18, 2009 6:29 AM
@Anhrabhoja I think it rather interesting that an incident that brings racially profiling to light angers you, and yet, your criticism of my post and the many comments on here seems to be a form of racial profiling in itself. You are accusing the commentators of a colonial mindset just because I happen to be white. I agree with you that the system in the U.S. is not good. I think the whole world would agree with that. But I was trying to make a point about India and the comments mostly agree with me--not because of the color of my skin--but because there is something to be said in all this kerfuffle. The elite, the wealthy and the well-known get treated better in India on the basis of them simply being elite, wealthy and well-known. And that needs to change.

From Andhrabhoja

August 18, 2009 7:16 AM
"The elite, the wealthy and the well-known get treated better in India on the basis of them simply being elite, wealthy and well-known." Exactly what is wrong with that? One only becomes elite , wealthy or positively famous by sheer hardwork. and you have to respect that. Probably US should learn on how we treat people, not the other way around. You guys dont even give respect to age. " And that needs to change." and exactly who are you tell what needs to change in India. Go fix your bankrupt country with teen pregnancies and broken-divorced families.

From Melissa A. Bell

August 18, 2009 7:45 AM
@Andhrabhoja Yes, you are completely right: the way we treat people in the US can be frightfully poor. But the way we treat people in India that are actually poor is frightfully poor. If hard work is the factor that gains your respect, than why not praise all those outside the elite working their hardest to provide for their family? Moolchand, the ear cleaner in Connaught Place that slogs through the day to bring home a few rupees for his six children. Meghna, a maid who's working three jobs to pay for her brother's ear surgery. Why does SRK deserve better treatment than them? He was born into a family that could afford to send him to good schools and that allowed him entrance into high-powered circles. Granted, he's also worked hard. But it was more than just "hard work" that got him to where he is today.

From RDX

August 18, 2009 10:14 AM
As part of growing middle class of India, I feel the sensitivity to common people is lost. Any insult / hassle to celebrity is considered as personal attack...& why...coz we view ourselves at their position on someday. On the contrary, though we talk about helping poor but never consider that we can be similar situation.

From jyothi

August 18, 2009 10:40 AM
SRK is an icon . US should not detain a celebrity. US pays little attention to the celebrity and VIPS of other country . US should learn that if they bypass security in any country for their celebrities and VIPS they must similar treatment to be VIPS celeberites of other country. Detaining is not normal as per Harbhajan and Salman. Salman does not understand that security check is different from detention. Instead of supporting SRK he thinks he can comment of any subject . harbhajan brought disgrace to country while playing for australia especially complain of sledging. Why did he not think itwas normal then. Brs

From Vinod

August 18, 2009 6:31 PM
Well Said Melisa. SRK does not deserve special treatment just because he is a celebrity. Most of my fellow Indians who are making noise on this issue does not even follow basic traffic rules in India, so do not expect them to understand security concern of a country.

From aditya

August 18, 2009 8:42 PM
anyone remember the racial profiling of a certain Harvard professor? very American, certainly not Muslim and perhaps also feeling the same indignation one rightly would feel on being judged by the colour of one's skin, the choice of one's god, one's gender, economic circumstance, educational background, or even your last name... apparently US Immigration though Shah Rukh Khan was to be stopped as 'Rukh' means to stop in Urdu and the Khan was interpreted as they CAN and they could, and they did... jokes apart - profiling occurs in every single interaction we have on every street corner, office, and other situation - the US Immigration (read Homeland Security) may have however, taken this to far and given too much power to those who really don't know what to do with it... i often wonder what they would make me grow through if i visited that nation... even homegrown Melissa seems to be having trouble... oh well!

From aditya

August 18, 2009 8:44 PM
i hope you realise Melissa (and Livemint readers) - this has become the most replied to posting in the Expat files ever...!

From Andhrabhoja

August 19, 2009 4:31 AM
@Vinod Get off your moral high ground. Guys like you who are supporting what happened to SRK have a slave mentality, albeit subconsciously. @ Melissa Gotta tell you not a very intelligent argument. Everybody needs to work for living duh! Who are pioneers, pathbreakers, icons...etc? They are people who have done really something special with their lives..Consider what SRK had done to bollywood and India..Priceless.. So as a respect to his achievement and keeping in mind peoples sensibilities, there should be a special treatment. Bunch of Jealous idiots shouting around "oh yes he is human/shud be treated like us..blah blah"..doesnt look mature and its indeed very frustrating...

From Andhrabhoja

August 19, 2009 4:35 AM
@ Jyothi, well said!

From Tom Hanks

August 19, 2009 11:18 PM
I heard he is cutting back on his trips to the US. How will we ever survive? You will not see me in India any time soon. Sure they don't care either.

From wake up

August 19, 2009 11:22 PM
to Sandi Mann: right he did nothing to promote the issue, but he is doing nothing to down play it either.

From Melissa A. Bell

August 20, 2009 12:57 AM
Thanks for all your comments guys. Really interesting to see the responses. Does this make you less inclined to see at SRK movie now? Do you want to see My name is Khan now?

And for the US, what could we do to prevent racial profiling? You're an airport security guy. You have 30 seconds to scan a guy and determine if he's a threat to national security. What do you go on? It seems to me a sad fact that people judge on appearance in all walks of life, not just when police or airport agents are in the mix. But what can you do instead? Apropos of the SRK case, just talking generalities here. What needs to be done?

From chamz

August 21, 2009 11:15 PM
MELISSA I CAN VERY CLEARLY SEE THAT U ARE SOMEONE WHO HATES SRK. but the real problem is not whether we love him or hate him. Real problem is the way americans treat muslims. SHAHRUKH DIDN'T EXPECT A VIP TREATMENT. his manager was allowed to go as usual but he wasn't. what does this say? what about what Kabir Khan, Zayed Khan, Irfan Khan said? are they also leing. any idiot knows that Salman doesn't like Shahrukh and waiting for a opportunity to hit him.

From TRUTH

August 22, 2009 3:52 PM
Who the bloody hell is this person named "Indian"..??? He seems to be a blind srk oh sorry... piddy khan's fan.... Religion is a matter which shud not be used for personal benefits.. and he is giving piddy a shade under religious discrimination... moreover he is talking rubbish abt. a nice human being salman... If he really wants 2 know who salman is, he needs to interospect. And I warn you if u talk anythng nonsense abt. salman in future....

From TRUTH

August 22, 2009 4:06 PM
Mr. Raj whosoever you may be.... I don't really care... you said a lot of salman and srk..... every point abt. sallu taken..... ya he made sum mistakes but is a totally different person now.... no one can ever match his humanity.... he is a person who learns from mistakes nd don't repeat further.... But how dare you call srk a "grounded" person..?? He is such a selfish pig and attraction hunger dat for publicity stunt he can go 2 ny extent. he can have million followers but doesn't have a single frnd to stand by his side.... "Rishton ke aashiyane me wo bahut garib hai"

From TRUTH

August 22, 2009 4:29 PM
Well said Bulkesh and sania....... tum log bhi kuch sikho inse.....

From Observor

August 23, 2009 5:01 AM
I am fairly in agreement with Melissa's viewpoint. I have been help up at the airport a couple of times. Is it inconvenient....yes. Is it bad...surely no!!! There were all sorts of people there and the staff is highly professional. These policies make me feel safer and that is what counts. Profiling is an easy, sensible and practical approach even if it may be inconvenient to some. It's not a question of how popular a person is....everyone has to be looked at based on the set policies (whether it SRK or it is a daily wage labourer). Though I am an ardid appreciator of SRK's entertainment skills, I felt negatively about the way he has handled the whole affair. It was in bad taste and gave a sense of having inflated airs about himself. Making a hue and cry for being delayed by slightly more than an hour is ridiculous!! I wonder how many people making these emotinal and passionate comments on behalf of SRk have really experienced what being detained at the airport is like......it's definately not as bad as SRK has made it out to be.

From Pigeon

August 24, 2009 1:03 PM
Shahruk thinks no end of himself...he needs more humiliation..

From cherry

August 24, 2009 1:14 PM
wow..salman khan talking bout security n stuff..gud 2 see a guy who's in n out of jail talk bout it :P..Sharuk sucks..yeah he thinks no end of himself..

From Sharninder

August 26, 2009 1:49 PM
Ok. People. SRK is not a known icon ! He's popular in India, known in Dubai and maybe a couple of SE Asian countries, that's about it. And yes, he was targetted for having a muslim name and so are others. There is no point in comparing his case with "imagine what happens to a common man" because believe it or not .. he is a common man ! If the US can detain Bob Dylan, SRK is nothing in front of him. Really and Dylan didn't even go to the press cribbing. And believe it or not, Dylan is far, FAR bigger than SRK can ever dream to be.

From Rahul

August 26, 2009 5:50 PM
"I know. I have been. About seven or eight times." Hahahahahahaha! Leave alone Indians like me, even your own brethen don't want you to enter your own country??? This is hilarious but I understand and I know it's not easy - umm I mean not for you but for the customs guy to bear you for 2 hours when reading first two lines of your blog can give you bouts of migrate and makes you want to throw up! Coming to the point, it seems you were standing next in line to SRK to know all the 'inside' scoop huh! What he said, how he said, and what he got in reply! Do you know he actually said "movie star"??? Who knows he could have even have said "film actor" or something! Was your source the NYT or HT or TOI like me and million others who chose to comment on this blog? (yawns) I disagree that SRK was part of the power circles, his father ran a chai (tea) shop owner at a New Delhi hospital - and knew Indira Gandhi vaguely - thats what you call being in the power circle? One doesn't run a chai shop being in the power circles (years after taking up journalism - still not researching well Melissa, are you?). Frankly speaking America has its own VIP culture, one which is very subtle and unlike India's VIP culture, every much out of gaze if the common man to see or feel! Here's a good example - only yesterday, Gurcharan Das was to release his new book at the American Centre where Shashi Tharoor and Arun Shorie were to be the panelists. AC advertised the event gleefully in the information calender but made no mention that it was a programme by invitation only. While calling them, I was asked if I has recieved an invite, when I told them that such a thing had not been mentioned in the event calender, I was informed that the invitees were preselected by the Centre and were sent the invitations to be able to attend it! In the evening, the Centre was decorated with lighting and the library staff themselves directing traffic to Antariksh Bhawan. Centre director, Anne-Lee Sheshadri (who was dressed in a knee length formal black dress all day long while walking through the library) changed in to a glowing pink saree, apparently to receive one minister, one-former minister and one "Harvard educated" columnist, commentator and author. Ha! I'm pretty sure inside the hall first three rows must have been reserved for the VVIPs, the next five for the VIPs, the next 7 for the staff and the remaining for the invited hoi-polloi. Melissa, try fooling others with your in-America-we-Don't-have-a-VIP-culture rhetoric, it aint' working here. Just about every goddamn country in this world has a VIP culture, but in India just like poverty it is very much visible, in the west all this is done very subtly. The super-rich in Europe and America are so secretive that no one knows where they fly from and where they land! As JNU Sociologist Dipankar Gupta says "They are so affluent and out of reach that we don't even know where their landing strips and clubs are hidden." Everything is available to them, right from drugs to high class prostitutes and with the knowledge of the FBI and the CIA. You may have decided to ignore this on purpose but the number of prostitutes operating in the DC metropolitan area outnumbers those operating even in other big cities like Houston or Chicago! If there was no VIP culture then why is it that it takes a scandal to uncover a prostitution racket (vis-a-vis the DC Madame episode) Who exactly are you trying to fool??? So typically the white man's attitude - always pointing out to the coloured man's shortcomings while very cleverly hiding one's own! Hahaha! Melissa, what tall promises- that we Americans don't have a VIP!!! Now see who's got the wind out of their sails...?

From propertynice

August 28, 2009 5:24 PM
propertynice.com - No.1 India Real Estate & Property Portal to buy, sell, rent commercial & residential properties in India. Your Property Search ends here For more information visit this site:http://www.propertynice.com

From Rahul

September 20, 2009 11:57 PM
Correction: Migraine not migrate!

POST YOUR COMMENT

:
(required)
 
Email Address
(required)
   
(optional)
(HTML not allowed)